On what basis do you say that it's "the truth" that Ms. Fluke is a "slut"? She could be in a long-term relationship with one man and her monthly birth-control pill expenses would be the same as if she were promiscuous.
Not a slut. She just wants someone else to pay for her unmarried sex-capades.
26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."
Right after that cited goal of Communism is this:
27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a "religious crutch."
If Sandra Fluke wishes to engage those long-term sexual relations with that one man you cited, it needs to be within the bonds of marriage. Yes, I'm old fashioned and my views, which I believe are Bible-based, are narrow and intolerant of what passes for morality nowadays. I date back to 1943 and the "New Morality" is the "Old Immorality" in my opinion.
But you asked a question in all sincerity and I gave you my unvarnished honest answer. Even here on Free Republic, where we Christians need not apologize for our convictions, there will be probably some snickers headed my way. So be it. I'll go ahead and take my lumps but will stand by what I just wrote here and cling to my so-called "religious crutch".
In any case, thanks for asking and I hope you'll find my response worthwhile even if you disagree.