You wrote: “Brother Loves Traveling Salvation Show is playing right into Obama’s hands. Conservatives better start paying attention. This is not an election for POTUS, Preacher of the United States. Social issues are not the problems right now, getting a Marxist out of office is.”
“Marxism” is a POLITICAL RELIGION ie: “Social Issues”.
WSJ
WONDER LAND
FEBRUARY 9, 2012, 9:51 A.M. ET By DANIEL HENNINGER
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204136404577211280758375336.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop
Transformers
The Catholic church learns the true meaning of Obama’s ‘transformative’ presidency.
Pope John Paul II, surveying from his seat in the eternal hereafter the battle between the American Catholic Church and the Obama administration over mandated contraception services, must be permitting himself a sad smile. The pope knew more than most about the innate tensions between the state and its citizens.
The Obamaites will object that it is unfair to liken their government to the Communist Party of Poland.
That is not the point.
What the former Karol Wojtyla knew is that any state will claim benevolence on behalf of doing whatever it thinks it needs to do in pursuit of its goals.
White House Press Secretary Jay Carney invoked the good in defense of the Obama law’s universal reach: “The administration decidedthe president agrees with this decisionthat we need to provide these services that have enormous health benefits for American women and that the exemption that we carved out is appropriate.”
The American Catholic Church, from left to right, is now being handed a lesson in the hierarchy of raw political authority.
One hopes they and their supporters will recognize that they have not been singled out.
The federal government’s forcings routinely touch other groups in this countryschools, doctors, farmers, businesses.
The church’s fight is not the whole or the end of it.
Since he appeared, no other word has been invoked more often to describe Barack Obama’s purposes than “transformative.”
Last year, Mr. Obama began to be criticized by some of his supporters for being insufficiently transformative while holding the powers of the presidency—this despite passing the biggest social entitlement since 1965, an $800 billion stimulus bill, raising federal spending to 24% of GDP and passing the Dodd-Frank restructuring of the U.S. financial industry.
Naturally an interviewer this week asked Mr. Obama why he hadn’t been more “transformative.” The president replied that he deserved a second term, because “we’re not done.”
In term two, it will be Uncle Sam, Transformer.
For many years, Catholic Charities U.S.A. has taken federal money to enlarge its budget. The people who run the Catholic Church, though not everyone in the pews, thought this was a good bargain.
Here is the head of Catholic Charities, in 1997, describing the relationship: “We have been partners with government to help government do what it wants to do and what we believe it should do.”
This 1997 statement was in response to criticism leveled at Catholic Charities back then by freshman U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania , who attacked the organization for its opposition to welfare-reform legislation. Mr. Santorum said welfare hurt rather than helped poor families.
Over decades, this deal with the federal government didn’t change, even as Catholic bishops closed churches and parochial schools across the country for lack of funds.
Here is Sr. Carol Keehan’s statement when the House in 2009 passed the Obama health-care bill with only one Republican aye vote:
“The Catholic Health Association applauds the U.S. House of Representatives and President Obama for enacting health care legislation that will bring security and health to millions of American families.”
Let the record show that the Catholic bishops opposed the legislation, fearing a conflict with the church’s beliefs.
So here we are, with the government demanding that the church hold up its end of a Faustian bargain that was supposed to permit it to perform limitless acts of virtue.
Instead, what the government believes the deal is about, more than anything else, is compliance.
Politically bloodless liberals would respond that, net-net, government forcings do much social good despite breaking a few eggs, such as the Catholic Church’s First Amendment sensibilities.
That is one view.
But the depth of anger among Catholics over this suggests they recognize more is at stake here than political results.
They are right.
The question raised by the Catholic Church’s battle with ObamaCare is whether anyone can remain free of a U.S. government determined to do what it wants to do, at whatever cost.
Older Americans have sought for years to drop out of Medicare and contract for their own health insurance. They cannot without forfeiting their Social Security payments.
They effectively are locked in.
Nor can the poor escape Medicaid, even as the care it gives them degrades.
Farmers, ranchers and loggers struggled for years to protect their livelihoods beneath uncompromising interpretations of federal environmental laws. They, too, had to comply.
University athletic programs were ground up by the U.S. Education Department’s rote, forced gender balancing of every sport offered.
With the transformers, it never stops.
In September, the Obama Labor Department proposed rules to govern what work children can do on farms.
After an outcry from rural communities over the realities of farm traditions, the department is now reconsidering a “parental exemption.” Good luck to the farmers.
The Catholic Church has stumbled into the central battle of the 2012 presidential campaign: What are the limits to Barack Obama’s transformative presidency?
The Catholic left has just learned one answer: When Mr. Obama says, “Everyone plays by the same set of rules,” it means they conform to his rules.
What else could it mean?
Anyone who signs up for more of this deal by assuming that it will never force them to fall into line is getting what they deserve.