Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: darrellmaurina

“However, I don’t see that focusing on Santorum’s objections to gay marriage and abortion will hurt him in conservative Republican circles. . . “

How do you think it will play with the side that matters in the general. .. the left and the rest of the uninformed American electorate?


965 posted on 02/08/2012 5:45:58 AM PST by adc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 964 | View Replies ]


To: adc

An overwhelming majority of Americans oppose gay marriage. A smaller majority (maybe 51%) oppose abortion. These are not losing issues for Republicans in the fall but they shouldn’t be the focus. They won’t be. Obama and his failed policies will be.


990 posted on 02/08/2012 4:02:16 PM PST by Alt Right (Voted for Clinton in 92 (my first election) and the Republican Revolution in 1994!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 965 | View Replies ]

To: adc; All
965 posted on Wednesday, February 08, 2012 7:45:58 AM by adc: “(QUOTING ME:) ‘However, I don’t see that focusing on Santorum’s objections to gay marriage and abortion will hurt him in conservative Republican circles...’ How do you think it will play with the side that matters in the general... the left and the rest of the uninformed American electorate?”

That's a valid question.

To a large extent, winning a general election means turning out your own supporters. Evangelicals, unfortunately, have really bad turnout percentages. Conservative Roman Catholics are often from demographic groups which are likely to vote Democrat if they don't have a key religious motivation to vote Republican.

On the other hand, most pro-homosexual and pro-choice people aren't going to vote Republican anyway, so nominating a candidate who has a decades-long history of being vilified by the homosexual and pro-abortion community has the advantage of turning out conservatives to vote. Annoying people who probably wouldn't vote Republican anyway isn't a major problem.

I realize there are economic conservatives who define “conservative” in terms that closely resemble libertarianism. Those people aren't going to like Santorum, and I understand that. For those people who think being conservative is being opposed to “government intruding in your bedroom,” Santorum’s opposition to gay marriage and abortion won't go down well.

My response to Republicans who think that way is to say that I respect their right to vote for Mitt Romney, but even Romney professes to believe the same things Rick Santorum clearly does believe. Also, Newt Gingrich is also pro-life and opposed to gay marriages. So if we're going to have a Republican nominee who claims to be pro-life and anti-gay-mariage no matter who gets nominated, why not nominate someone who excites the base and turns them out in large numbers — including the key demographic of ethnic blue collar Roman Catholics in the upper Midwest who will be key to winning the states we need to win the presidential race?

I'm not saying Newt Gingrich can't win those voters — he may very well be able to do so. What I **AM** saying is that I seriously doubt if Mitt Romney can do so.

Bottom line: Liberal left-wing attacks on Rick Santorum are likely to seriously backfire. If groups like ACT-UP and Code Pink are stupid enough to do protests at Santorum events, most of America will be so grossed out, and conservative Catholics and evangelicals so deeply offended, that the net result is a plus for Santorum.

You can tell a lot about someone by knowing who their enemies are. Santorum’s enemies are the right ones to have.

See Psalm 139:21: “Do not I hate them, O LORD, that hate thee? and am not I grieved with those that rise up against thee?” I don't think that passage is appropriate to cite in very many cases, but with regard to homosexuality and abortion, it is.

993 posted on 02/08/2012 8:55:45 PM PST by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 965 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson