The article concluded: "Now, will we get the opportunity to debate the meaning of "subpoena" -- or whether the law even applies to this president?"
1 posted on
02/01/2012 7:17:08 PM PST by
Sallyven
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: Sallyven
Wasn’t he adopted by soeroto (sp?)
2 posted on
02/01/2012 7:22:40 PM PST by
TribalPrincess2U
(NOT VOTING gets 0bamao re-elected. Lets Newter the RINOS, then the Blank.)
To: Sallyven
Obama Got Served...
...which promptly went into the round circular file.
3 posted on
02/01/2012 7:23:45 PM PST by
PapaNew
To: Sallyven
4 posted on
02/01/2012 7:27:46 PM PST by
EEGator
To: Sallyven
5 posted on
02/01/2012 7:30:20 PM PST by
sourcery
(If true=false, then there would be no constraints on what is possible. Hence, the world exists.)
To: Sallyven
7 posted on
02/01/2012 7:32:31 PM PST by
snowsislander
(Gingrich 2012.)
To: Sallyven
Just a thought...
“Facts and truth really don’t have much to do with each other.”
Jail,Jail Jail
Obama need to be put in Jail!
People just don’t get it.
9 posted on
02/01/2012 7:37:01 PM PST by
hapnHal
(hapnHal)
To: Sallyven
Nice try and I agree but King Obama is our dictator and he makes his own law.
To: Sallyven
"Everyone knows the judge is obviously a racist if he doesn't throw this out of court."
13 posted on
02/01/2012 7:46:13 PM PST by
Baynative
(The penalty for not participating in politics is you will be governed by your inferiors.)
To: Sallyven
Click to Donate to Newt Gingrich
15 posted on
02/01/2012 7:48:46 PM PST by
hoosiermama
(Stand with God: Newt, and Sarah will be right next to you.)
To: Sallyven
The AG of Georgia should announce that should Zero enter the State, he will be arrested.
I just want to see what the Secret Service will do when the officers of the Georgia State Patrol attempt to make said arrest. They can't love that arrogant prick so much that they'd want to stop a duly sworn LEO from doing his lawful duty.
T'would be very interesting.
17 posted on
02/01/2012 7:50:53 PM PST by
Carry_Okie
(The RNC would prefer Obama to a conservative nominee.)
To: Sallyven
The most incredible thing to me is the complete lack of coverage. There is a chance that this challenge could result in Obama’s name not being on the Georgia ballot. One would think that would rate at least a human interest story somewhere in the back of at least a few papers, or a negative editorial. But everyone in the mainstream media is afraid to touch this story. Do the insiders think that this could result in a serious and possibly violent backlash or are they worried that our enemies will view this as a seriously weakened president and an opportunity to start trouble abroad?
19 posted on
02/01/2012 7:53:01 PM PST by
fireman15
(Check your facts before making ignorant statements.)
To: Sallyven
snip-”New evidence conclusively establishes that 25 U.S. Supreme Court opinions were sabotaged then republished at Justia.com during the run up to the 08 election. My prior report documented the scrubbing of just two cases. But last week, a third sabotaged case was discovered which led to a thorough examination of all US Supreme Court cases which cite Minor v. Happersett as they appeared on Justia.com between 2006 and the present.
Since Justia placed affirmations on each tampered opinion which state Full Text of Case, personnel may also be guilty of violating 18 U.S.C. 1018 by intentionally passing off tampered versions of US Supreme Court opinions as if they were official versions published by the US Supreme Court.”
http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/10/20/justia-com-surgically-removed-minor-v-happersett-from-25-supreme-court-opinions-in-run-up-to-08-election/
21 posted on
02/01/2012 7:54:29 PM PST by
Mortrey
(Impeach President Soros)
To: Sallyven
der 0berfuhrer Emperor Hussein 0bama didn't have to respond to the subpoena because he THINKS he is above the law. Rules are for us peons.
27 posted on
02/01/2012 7:56:50 PM PST by
The Sons of Liberty
(Psalm 109:8 Let his days be few and let another take his office. - Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
To: Sallyven
The US Constitution explicitly excuses Congressmen from such a thing, at least while they are on official business. But I haven’t heard of any parallel provision for a president, or a court case where the USSC heard the question concerning a question. This little Georgia court seems to be the mouse that roared.
28 posted on
02/01/2012 7:57:07 PM PST by
HiTech RedNeck
(Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
To: Sallyven
question concerning a question
I mean the question concerning a president
29 posted on
02/01/2012 7:58:29 PM PST by
HiTech RedNeck
(Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
To: Sallyven
Obama always has thought he was better than the rest of us & had his nose in the air to show his contempt for the U.S. & its citizens. He shows it with his over 90 rounds of golf, parties & overseas trips that are costing our people $$$$$ along with all the $$$$$ he gave to the Unions & his “special” friends. I’ve had enough & will relish the day he gets his “just rewards”.
30 posted on
02/01/2012 7:58:38 PM PST by
jrcats
(Justice is blind & deaf in Florida.)
To: Sallyven
What precedent exists, if any, for a sitting President agreeing to be compelled by any legal or administrative state authority? Absent his agreement, does any state theoretically have any such authority federally? Practically, has any state, much less a municipality, ever successfully compelled a sitting President to appear in a legal proceeding?
Before anyone embarrasses himself by asserting that Bill Clinton was compelled to testify and then perjured himself, that was to a federal judge.
40 posted on
02/01/2012 8:04:53 PM PST by
Hebrews 11:6
(Do you REALLY believe that (1) God IS, and (2) God IS GOOD?)
To: Sallyven
Strange. Last I checked, state courts couldn’t issue subpoenas to persons who aren’t in that state. They don’t have jurisdiction. All they can do is request that the witness’s state’s courts issue one. And even then, it is generally only available for depositions, not to compel appearance in court.
41 posted on
02/01/2012 8:05:00 PM PST by
The Pack Knight
(Laugh, and the world laughs with you. Weep, and the world laughs at you.)
To: Sallyven
Today, Attorney Van Irion, on behalf of his client, Georgia resident David Welden, filed a "Motion for Finding of Contempt" with Judge Malihi. And what sort of reception did that get?
44 posted on
02/01/2012 8:05:48 PM PST by
Lady Lucky
(I like to fire people. I don't care about the poor.)
To: Sallyven
49 posted on
02/01/2012 8:08:43 PM PST by
Mortrey
(Impeach President Soros)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson