Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Thank you, Rush for that great analysis of HOW the LAME Stream Media, the "Establishment Republicans", and their favored son Willard Mitt Romney trys to deceive the public.

They think we're stupid. Listen here and read here.
1 posted on 01/28/2012 4:00:24 AM PST by Yosemitest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Yosemitest

This is good news to get play on Rush’s show. It should undo most of the damage done by Drudge and maybe reverse the negative momentum. Not too sure why Rush ends that transcript reminding all of us that Santorum won the debate. He won it since no one was kicking his a** all day.

We ought to pray that Newt wins the nomination in Florida. This ugly nomination process is utterly disturbing and disgraceful. Lets get a Romney slap-down and coast our way into victory.


2 posted on 01/28/2012 4:13:04 AM PST by Apollo5600
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Yosemitest

We have to get off of the defense and start up the offensive momentum again but it’s pretty difficult with all the money being poured into the Romney offense. I don’t think, even with the truth as our ally, we’re going to be able to pull of a Florida win. At this point, I want to make Romney pay heavily for every inch of ground that he takes between now and the convention. I want his war chest empty after Super Tuesday.


3 posted on 01/28/2012 4:14:51 AM PST by RC one (the majority of republicans agree, anyone but Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Yosemitest

Ah sorry I will not be sold more deception. Elliot Abrams was ‘serving’ US in the White House, when Newt spoke on the House floor. Now if Abrams is senile and signed off on what some flack put in front of him, then retire him out so he does no more harm.


4 posted on 01/28/2012 4:18:04 AM PST by Just mythoughts (Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Yosemitest

Abrams needs to issue a public correction and apology ASAP!


5 posted on 01/28/2012 4:20:11 AM PST by RoosterRedux (Newt: "Why vote for the guy who lost to the guy who lost to Obama?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Yosemitest

remind me of Palin’s first national interview after being picked for VP. The interviewer asked her a question using fake quotes from her


6 posted on 01/28/2012 4:21:01 AM PST by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Yosemitest
This has caused a lot of damage to Newt's campaign.

Gross injustice from the media giants. What has taken place this past week is nothing more that an deliberate attempt to destroy a human being. People should be responsible for their words when hey write and speak untruths. I had to take a break from Rush. He really has let me down. I pray Newt can overcome this.

7 posted on 01/28/2012 4:32:05 AM PST by Christie at the beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Yosemitest

Rush:”I wasn’t trying to defend Newt, as AP said.”

Why not show some guts, you Turd, and support the man.

Rush is nothing more than another gutless wonder. He can’t say enough about Rick Santorum? A good and decent man. Newt is well over 50% if Santorum drops out.

Folks, the world is upside down and crazy since Thursday in my mind. Newt is anti-REagan? And the Washington establishment is sitting back and not coming our for the man.

Shame on you all. Shame on you Krauthammer. You were there.


10 posted on 01/28/2012 5:15:04 AM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Yosemitest
Thank you, Rush for that great analysis of HOW the LAME Stream Media, the "Establishment Republicans", and their favored son Willard Mitt Romney trys to deceive the public.

They think we're stupid

The problem is not with us Freepers as not only are we NOT stoooopid and can see right thru the thin veneer of these ad hominem attacks but realize where it's coming from and why...

The PROBLEM is that the majority of Republicans are not as informed as we are and much like the bottom-feeding, hate-monger Mittens and the elitist RINO, establishment did in Iowa, their attacks in Florida are taking a toll on Newt and it doesn't look good for the "home team."

I'm visiting here in Clearwater and since I arrived 3 weeks ago, there has been an incessant and non-stop airing (radio and tv) of vitriol and hit pieces (posing as ads) against Newt.

Mittens has deep pockets and will stoop to any level to win in Fl as this appears to be his (and Newt's) Waterloo.

12 posted on 01/28/2012 5:31:01 AM PST by Conservative Vermont Vet (l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Yosemitest

During the 80s, Willard was a democrat. This is amazingly ridiculous, more so coming from him.


16 posted on 01/28/2012 6:12:26 AM PST by Defiant (If there are infinite parallel universes, why Lord, am I living in the one with Obama as President?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Yosemitest
Was Rush fooled on Eliot Abrams? No. He was doing as he was told... by somebody.

"Eliot Abrams has impeccable credentials. He is beyond reproach..." If you heard that and weren't counting your spoons, I have a bridge to sell you.

17 posted on 01/28/2012 6:16:08 AM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Yosemitest
Rush does not have clean hands on this.

The day before he kept repeating how surprised he was that Newt said this bad stuff about Reagan. He used Fred Thompson and others as examples of why he doesn't endorse, asking what they think now that they have heard all these quotes, quotes that are now shown to be cherry picked and out of context.

Either his show prep was bad, his loyalties conflicted, or he has simply lost his touch. To discover how wrong Rush was, all you had to do was read the articles posted on FR before Rush spoke so negatively about Newt one day earlier.

I've always defended Rush before, he now has me wondering about his core beliefs. His inability or unwillingness to rail against Romney early on, and often has been more than disappointing. Romney has not been a conservative in the past, has been running a scorched earth negative campaign from the beginning, and if he wins he will bring down everything that Rush has claimed to be for.

He's been more disappointing to conservatives in the past month than I can express.

20 posted on 01/28/2012 6:33:06 AM PST by Lakeshark (NbIttoalbl,cRwIdtaa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Yosemitest

I hope that the tea party is getting mobolized fast in Florida! If we have any chance of beating the establishment it has to start here and at the grassroots level!!!
Go FLORIDA TEA PARTY!! Do it for all of us! Do it for the cause! I do believe we are seeing something far bigger taking place than just a primary...but FLORIDA WE THE PEOPLE need you to RISE UP!!! This is an important moment in the struggle ahead!


21 posted on 01/28/2012 6:45:46 AM PST by AlwaysFrosty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Yosemitest

I remember watching a televised press conference the first President Bush had. Some reporter asked a stupid question and President Bush basically told him that only an idiot would ask a question like that. I could feel the anger in my living room from the old media reporters. The old media didn’t just go after him because he was a Republican, they went after him because he insulted one of the kingmakers. President Bush went from a 90+% approval rating to losing a bid for a second term. The old media certainly shills for the Democrats, but if you insult them, and telling the truth about their shilling for the Democrats is insulting to them, they will spend every waking hour trying to destroy you. They are arrogant and they believe that they’re the kingmakers. They want the Republicans to fear them. Our free and impartial press, freely and impartially shilling for the Democrats with absolutely no self-examination. Any advertiser sponsoring the old media should only be paying 10% of what they’re billed.


22 posted on 01/28/2012 7:02:43 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Yosemitest

bump


23 posted on 01/28/2012 7:57:49 AM PST by Sharkfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Yosemitest; All
Thank you.

It says a lot that Rush Limbaugh had to publicize research that should have been done by the Washington Times, Washington Post, and the capital bureaus of other major national newspapers. It's not like Newt Gingrich's speeches in the Congressional Record were classified information. This was all there for anyone to find who cared to fact-check by visiting a library and looking at hard-copy records of the speeches.

This is why sound-bite journalism is dangerous. TV has a place, but long-form articles existed for a reason, and a big part of the reason was so reporters could check out allegations.

Since there's probably no future for print newspapers, I sincerely hope crowdsourcing and internet media will be successful at retaining the “long form” journalism that was once a major purpose for newspapers, namely, digging into stuff and doing fact-checking.

25 posted on 01/28/2012 8:29:03 AM PST by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Yosemitest
Deceived? How?

Gingrich was saying the same thing as Abrams's father-in-law, Norman Podhoretz, at the time, so there's some deception or disingenousness involved on his own part.

Elliot Abrams is very familiar with the position Newt represented at the time, and it's not exactly what he wants readers to assume it to be, and what deception there is is most likely his own and conscious.

On the other hand, few people would probably want Podhoretz for president, so maybe there's some sense after all in Abrams's attack (and nobody outside can really say for sure how Elliot might actually feel about Norman).

The statement that Newt's comments showed him to be reliably conservative in attacking Reagan from the right is a little iffy, though. In one way, there may be some truth in it, Newt was being more Reaganite than Ron Reagan.

But Newt's criticisms also showed some grandstanding and a desire to show off that might come out in other ways. There were plenty of Republican congressmen who had qualms about what Reagan was doing who didn't showboat as Newt did.

27 posted on 01/28/2012 9:13:33 AM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Yosemitest

Ditto


28 posted on 01/28/2012 9:34:06 AM PST by Maryhere ("HE comes to rule the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Yosemitest

I’ve lost confidence in Drudge’s reporting. I hope Drudge is the one most damaged by these stories.


34 posted on 01/28/2012 1:21:55 PM PST by topfile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Yosemitest

I stopped listening to Rush years ago when he started throwing in with many knee-jerk pundits and spouting nonsense that didn’t help our side at all. I lost respect for him then, after 20+years of being an ardent supporter.

Glad to see he can admit to being wrong and will correct the record.


40 posted on 01/30/2012 12:53:50 PM PST by unsycophant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson