Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MHGinTN
We might make the analogy that Mike Nifong also had a Grand Jury, and many of the FReepers who refused to believe that indictment are all too willing to claim every word in the current document is Gospel.

As for the vermin crap, if everyone who won't join your lynch mob is vermin, then, yeah, I'm vermin. This is not evidence. This is an accusation. That's all. No evidence has been heard by any trier of fact in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

160 posted on 11/14/2011 10:43:39 PM PST by FredZarguna (Paterno and Spanier were railroaded on the basis of hearsay; those who call this just are vermin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]


To: FredZarguna

“...No evidence has been heard by any trier of fact in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania...”

So - the Peds have been successful...for over a decade.


174 posted on 11/14/2011 10:55:35 PM PST by 2ndamendmentpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

To: FredZarguna

Nice try. Are you a contributor to the Second Mile org? Have you ushered young fatherless boys into sports? Are you Lanny Davis? Are you Scott Ritter? Do you realize how deceitful your posting is when you deny what is actually in the Granbd Jury Presentments from testimonies taken under oath? Yes, you’re vermin.


181 posted on 11/14/2011 11:02:37 PM PST by MHGinTN (Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

To: FredZarguna

I think the only thing those events have in common are the words “Grand Jury.”

This is several orders of magnitude worse than the (supposed/accused) Duke situation...

Do you think this case will never be tried?


192 posted on 11/14/2011 11:08:59 PM PST by 2ndamendmentpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

To: FredZarguna

“We might make the analogy that Mike Nifong also had a Grand Jury, and many of the FReepers who refused to believe that indictment are all too willing to claim every word in the current document is Gospel.”

You seem to have a problem with people executing independent judgement and discernment. If there are two GJ reports, detailing different incidents, one could read them and conclude that one is most likely true, and the other most likely false. I think most of the people that you are talking about did not just hear there was a GJ report and say “oh he’s guilty”, they read the thing and weighed the testimony themselves and came to their own conclusions.


225 posted on 11/14/2011 11:50:29 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

To: FredZarguna
Yes, Sandusky is LEGALLY innocent, we can all agree on that.

But don't try to defend him on these threads as if this is a court room-it isn't.

285 posted on 11/15/2011 3:53:38 AM PST by fortheDeclaration (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson