Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: crusty old prospector
Anecdotes are not evidence. All I am saying is that in this situation the source of the contamination should be identified. If it is shown to be from a failure of technology then the use of that technology should be reassessed. The EPA has already concluded that fracking does not pose a threat to groundwater, and fracking is excluded from the Safe Water Drinking Act. If those assumptions are based on inadequate information, then they need to be reviewed.
74 posted on 11/11/2011 8:54:29 AM PST by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: stormer

“Anecdotes are not evidence”

Which is why you are being asked to name trouble spots and the firms and people concerned. Don’t broad brush with unsupported generalities.


78 posted on 11/11/2011 8:56:37 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (ya don't tug on Superman's cape/ya don't spit into the wind--and ya don't speak well of Mitt to Jim!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson