Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rintense

I think it is almost necessary that Sarah run now. I think she should try really hard to garner 20% in Iowa which I believe she could do.

If Herman Cain gets close to 20 as well then have a conversation with him about who should go forward.

This would be an interesting conversation but it would happen.

The elites are trying to choose our candidate folks you may not like Sarah but they are trying to hijack the process before one vote is cast.

Any Republican nominee would kill Obama he is toast so as Bachmann said” why settle.”

If Herman can wins the nomination he will be President same with Sarah or anyone else that can get the nomination.


12 posted on 09/29/2011 4:58:39 AM PDT by vicar7 ("Polls are for strippers and cross-country skiers" Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: vicar7

You’re smoking something. Palin only got 35 votes out of 17,000 cast at the Iowa Straw Poll. There is very little Palin support in Iowa and it’s probably going down each day. She has over played this cat and mouse game.


126 posted on 09/29/2011 9:13:19 AM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: vicar7

One thing is clear - the GOP is changed forever now. It was bound to happen, a demographic thing for the most part along with some people with newly opened eyes.

Let me use Zogby’s latest poll to illustrate:

I am not a supporter of Paul, but he has 11% of the GOP solidly in his corner. He is for very limited government, to say the least.

Then we have Cain. Cain has about 28% of the GOP in his corner (more or less). Cain is for limited government.

Bachmann has 4%. Cain stole most of her supporters but anyway it’s another 4% for limited government.

Right there, you have 43% of the GOP voting base saying they want extremely or very limited federal government. The rest of the field - Romney, Perry, Newt et al - aren’t necessarily supported by “big government” people. Many Perry supporters are from the Christian right, many Newt supporters like his anti-obama tactics and reformist credentials. All GOPers should lean towards smaller government, but many GOP (and even many conservatives) can be statists on issues they care a lot about (gay marriage, pot smoking/WOD, international relations, abortion).

My point is, 43% of the GOP are now overtly throwing their weight behind a very pronounced small government reformist. Among the other 57%, more than 7% I venture are also for a much more limited fed gov. In this climate it is IMPOSSIBLE for a middle of the road, compromising, statist establishment candidate to win the primary. This is probably why Christy won’t jump in - there is nothing for him to gain, he’d could knock out both Perry and Romney and he’d still be in second place at best.

This is a very good thing. I don’t care if Sarah runs, in fact at this point it is probably better if she stays out. She can be a king maker in some ways, but anyway we don’t need this campaign shaken up, let’s let this field gel a bit and let the messages get out. I bet we will see this 43% number solidify. As some of the field drops out it may go over 50%.


263 posted on 09/29/2011 3:21:32 PM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson