Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lakeshark

Sorry, but IF there’s an opt-out, and there was, then it was not a “mandate”. It was a standard. There is a difference.

There are also a few things important to know:

Additional risk factors primarily identified for females include partner sexual behavior (26) and immune status (37,38). Genital HPV infection also can be transmitted by nonsexual routes, but this is uncommon. Nonsexual routes of genital HPV transmission include transmission from a mother to a newborn baby (39,40).


90 posted on 09/13/2011 12:26:43 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their VICTORY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: xzins; perfect_rovian_storm; All
Michelle Malkin did not make up the word, it was a mandate, everyone in Texas called it a mandate at the time, the executive order called it a requirement or mandatory. Here's an article about the “mandate” from 2007. If you do a google search (any search engine for that matter), you will find hundreds of articles that describe it as a “mandate”, you actually won't find an article that does not call it a “mandate” until the PerryKrishnas changed the history of what happened: http://www.southernstudies.org/2007/05/texas-governor-defeated-on.html
99 posted on 09/13/2011 1:12:53 PM PDT by Lakeshark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson