Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP Plans Weekly Votes To Repeal "Job-Destroying Regulations," New Tax Cuts
BusinessInsider ^ | August 29, 2011 | Zeke Miller

Posted on 09/03/2011 3:14:08 PM PDT by upchuck

In a memo to Republican lawmakers, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) outlined his caucus' plans for the fall — including almost weekly votes to repeal so-called ""Job-Destroying Regulations."

While the "Super Committee" focuses on $1.5 trillion in deficit reduction, Cantor says the House will "continue our focus on the jobs crisis."

Beginning in the week of September 12th, the chamber will take up legislation restricting the National Labor Relations Board's ability to restrict where employers create jobs — a response to the ongoing litigation over Boeing's new South Carolina production facility.

The House will also seek to delay some of President Barack Obama's new emissions regulations for power plants, boilers, and cement production plans — which Cantor says cost jobs.

Cantor adds that the chamber will also consider a 20 percent small business tax deduction, as well as repealing a rule requiring government entities to withhold 3 percent of pay to vendors to encourage them to comply with tax laws.

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gopplan; jobs; regulations
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Highlights of Cantor's memo: (MACT stands for maximum achievable control technology)

NLRB’s Boeing Ruling (Week of September 12)

Utility MACT and CSAPR (Week of September 19)

Boiler MACT (Week of October 3)

Cement MACT (Week of October 3)

Coal Ash (October/November)

Grandfathered Health Plans (November/December)

Ozone Rule (Winter)

Farm Dust (Winter)

Greenhouse Gas (Winter)

NLRB’s Ambush Elections (Winter)

Note: The Ozone Rule mentioned above is the one nobama recently agreed to trash.

1 posted on 09/03/2011 3:14:10 PM PDT by upchuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: upchuck
If the Republicans were serious about smaller government, and didn't want to control it and expand it to support their agenda, the wouldn't waste their time with one or two (or ten) reguations. The would pass this:

Regulations are not Laws Act

No regulation proposed by the Executive Branch or any agency thereof shall have the force of law until it is passed by a majority of both houses of Congress and signed into law by the President.

All regulations currently documented in the "Code of Federal Regulations" will sunset 5 years after the passage of this act, unless those regulations are presented to Congress and passed by a majority in both houses of the Congress and signed into law by the President.
I've emailed and faxed that proposal to my Establishment, Ruling Class RINO Congress Critter, but received no response so far.
2 posted on 09/03/2011 3:17:16 PM PDT by cc2k ( If having an "R" makes you conservative, does walking into a barn make you a horse's (_*_)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
Let the games begin. I hope they follow through on this. It will make good PR even if they don't get anything past the Senate.
3 posted on 09/03/2011 3:19:15 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cc2k

everyone please remember , it is not just regs, we must stop OBAMACARE!


4 posted on 09/03/2011 3:21:05 PM PDT by maddogtiger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cc2k

everyone please remember , it is not just regs, we must stop OBAMACARE!


5 posted on 09/03/2011 3:21:12 PM PDT by maddogtiger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cc2k

I saw you post that once before and adopted it into my notes for my dream amendment to restore the constitution to it’s original intent.


6 posted on 09/03/2011 3:27:16 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (Proud to be a small monthly donor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Optimistically expounding on your post:
Top 10 Job-Destroying Regulations:

-NLRB’s Boeing Ruling (Week of September 12): On April 20, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued a complaint against The Boeing Company for the alleged transfer of an assembly line from Washington to South Carolina. Yet, not one union employee at Boeing’s Puget Sound facility has lost his or her job as a result of the proposed South Carolina plant. Still, the NLRB is pursuing a “restoration order” against Boeing that would cost South Carolina thousands of jobs and deter future investment in the United States. H.R. 2587, the Protecting Jobs From Government Interference Act, sponsored by Rep. Tim Scott (SC), would take the common sense step of preventing the NLRB from restricting where an employer can create jobs in the United States.

-Utility MACT and CSAPR (Week of September 19): The Administration’s new maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards and cross-state air pollution rule (CSAPR) for utility plants will affect electricity prices for nearly all American consumers. In total, 1,000 power plants are expected to be affected. The result for middle class Americans? Annual electricity bill increases in many parts of the country of anywhere from 12 to 24 percent. H.R. 2401, the Transparency in Regulatory Analysis of Impacts on the Nation (TRAIN) Act, sponsored by Rep. John Sullivan (OK), would require a cumulative economic analysis for specific EPA rules, and specifically delay the final date for both the utility MACT and CSAPR rules until the full impact of the Obama Administration’s regulatory agenda has been studied.

-Boiler MACT (Week of October 3): From hospitals to factories to colleges, thousands of major American employers use boilers that will be impacted by the EPA’s new “boiler MACT” rules. These new stringent rules will impose billions of dollars in capital and compliance costs, increase the cost of many goods and services, and put over 200,000 jobs at risk. The American forest and paper industry, for example, will see an additional burden of at least $5-7 billion. H.R. 2250, the EPA Regulatory Relief Act, sponsored by Rep. Morgan Griffith (VA), would provide a legislative stay of four interrelated rules issued by the EPA in March of this year. The legislation would also provide the EPA with at least 15 months to re-propose and finalize new, achievable rules that do not destroy jobs, and provide employers with an extended compliance period.

-Cement MACT (Week of October 3): The “cement MACT” and two related rules are expected to affect approximately 100 cement plants in America, setting exceedingly stringent requirements that will be cost-prohibitive or technically infeasible to achieve. Increased costs and regulatory uncertainty for the American cement industry—the foundation of nearly all infrastructure projects—are likely to offshore thousands of American jobs. Ragland, Alabama, for example, recently saw the suspension of a $350 million cement production facility, putting 1,500 construction jobs on hold and additional permanent and high-paying plant operation jobs in limbo. H.R. 2681, the Cement Sector Regulatory Relief Act, sponsored by Rep. John Sullivan (OK), would provide a legislative stay of these three rules and provide EPA with at least 15 months to re-propose and finalize new, achievable rules that do not destroy jobs, and provide employers with an extended compliance period.

-Coal Ash (October/November): These anti-infrastructure regulations, commonly referred to as the “coal ash” rules, will cost hundreds of billions of dollars, affecting everything from concrete production to building products like wall board. The result is an estimated loss of well over 100,000 jobs. H.R. 2273, the Coals Residuals Reuse and Management Act, sponsored by Rep. David McKinley (WV), would create an enforceable minimum standard for the regulation of coal ash by the states, allowing their use in a safe manner that protects jobs.

-Grandfathered Health Plans (November/December): We all remember when President Obama promised Americans that if they liked their health care plan they could keep it. Now, the Obama Administration has been issuing further restrictions against those previously protected plans. The result, by the Administration’s own estimates, will be a loss of 49 to 80 percent of small employer plans, 34 to 64 percent of large employer plans, and 40 to 67 percent of individual insurance plans. Meanwhile, employers losing their grandfathered status will face steep penalties, increasing their costs and negatively affecting wages and job growth. The Energy and Commerce, Ways and Means, and Education and Workforce committees will soon be working on legislation to repeal these ObamaCare restrictions.

-Ozone Rule (Winter): This effective ban or restriction on construction and industrial growth for much of America is possibly the most harmful of all the currently anticipated Obama Administration regulations. Consequences would reach far across the U.S. economy, resulting in an estimated cost of $1 trillion or more over a decade and millions of jobs. Unlike her predecessors, EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson is pushing for a premature readjustment of the current ozone standards, dramatically increasing the number of “nonattainment” areas. The new readjustment rule is expected early this fall and I expect the Energy and Commerce Committee to act swiftly to prevent its implementation, in order to protect American jobs.

-Farm Dust (Winter): The EPA is expected to issue revised standards for particulate matter (PM) in the near future. Any downward revision to PM standards will significantly impact economic growth and jobs for businesses and people throughout rural America that create dust, like the farmer in Atkinson, Illinois, who raised his concerns with the President at a town hall earlier this month. While the President may have sent him on a bureaucratic wild goose chase, the House will act promptly on H.R. 1633, the Farm Dust Regulation Prevention Act, sponsored by Rep. Kristi Noem (SD). H.R. 1633 would protect American farmers and jobs by establishing a one year prohibition against revising any national ambient air quality standard applicable to coarse PM and limiting federal regulation of dust where it is already regulated under state and local laws.

-Greenhouse Gas (Winter): The EPA’s upcoming greenhouse gas new source performance standards (NSPS) will affect new and existing oil, natural gas, and coal-fired power plants, as well as oil refineries, nationwide. While the impact on the economy and jobs are likely to be severe, the rules are quickly moving forward, once again revealing the Administration’s disregard for the consequences of their policies on our jobs crisis. Again, I expect Chairman Upton and the Energy and Commerce Committee to move swiftly in the coming months to protect American jobs and consumers.

-NLRB’s Ambush Elections (Winter): This summer, the NLRB issued a notice of proposed rulemaking that could significantly alter current union representation election procedures, giving both employers and employees little time to react to union formations in the future. The result will increase labor costs and uncertainty for nearly all private employers in the U.S. The House will soon consider legislation that will bring common sense to union organizing procedures to protect the interests of both employers and their workers.


7 posted on 09/03/2011 3:31:52 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (Proud to be a small monthly donor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

More optimism:

IMMEDIATE TAX RELIEF TO CREATE MIDDLE CLASS JOBS

The second focus of our jobs agenda this fall and winter will pursue tax relief designed to help American employers create middle class jobs. Small businesses, in particular, are overburdened with taxes that destroy jobs and in a fragile economy, the worst thing government can do is impose tax increases that prevent small businesses from hiring. Instead, government should be focused on ways to enable businesses small and large to unlock more capital and create new jobs.

Therefore, under Chairman Dave Camp’s leadership, the Ways and Means Committee will be exploring a number of ways to remove tax burdens for job creators and incentivize small businesses. These targeted efforts will not interfere with House Republicans’ continued pursuit of fundamental tax reform, just as we proposed in our budget resolution this spring. Rather, the following proposals represent bipartisan and pro-growth steps that can be taken immediately to help businesses hire those struggling to find a job today.

3% Withholding Rule Repeal:
Beginning in 2013, federal, state, and local governments will be required to withhold three percent of all government payments made to contractors in excess of $100 million. While the law has been delayed multiple times, its effect once implemented will be massive—causing accounting burdens on governments and potentially harmful cash flow disruptions for contractors and subcontractors across all sectors. Therefore, we will move quickly this fall to repeal this burdensome requirement and relieve construction contractors, medical providers, manufacturers, farmers, and many others providing goods and services under government contracts of the uncertainty the impending law is creating.

20% Small Business Tax Deduction:
Small businesses employ about half of all Americans, yet President Obama is proposing federal tax rates that could take away more than 40 percent of their income. While the previous Democrat majority was pushing through their nearly $1 trillion stimulus, we began work on a proposal to allow small business people to take a tax deduction equal to 20% of their income. The goal was simple—immediately free up funds for small business people to retain and hire new employees, and reinvest in and grow their businesses. In light of the stimulus’s failure, and our current position in the majority, I expect the House to move quickly in the coming months on this common sense and pro-growth small business proposal to create middle-class jobs.


8 posted on 09/03/2011 3:35:01 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (Proud to be a small monthly donor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

NLRB’s Boeing Ruling (Week of September 12)

BTTT


9 posted on 09/03/2011 3:53:16 PM PDT by onyx (You're here on FR, so support it! If you support SARAH PALIN & want on her ping list, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Fine and dandy; but, where are the votes to defUnd Obamacare?


10 posted on 09/03/2011 4:04:24 PM PDT by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck; All

Sound like a weekly attempt to make the Dem-led Senate look bad.

....Hey! That’s a good thing!

Atleast that way my tagline might get airplay....


11 posted on 09/03/2011 4:04:32 PM PDT by TheRobb7 (OBAMA 2012: NO TAX LEFT BEHIND)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
(Obama) Job Killer In Chief (Peter Schiff)
12 posted on 09/03/2011 4:06:20 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

This is truly a great idea, even though it was mentioned that it will not get past the senate. If it does it will not get past the president. If it does then some federal judge will place an injunction.


13 posted on 09/03/2011 4:08:27 PM PDT by HChampagne (I DO NOT TR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Thanks for the xpost.


14 posted on 09/03/2011 4:36:59 PM PDT by upchuck (Rerun: Think you know hardship? Wait till the dollar is no longer the world's reserve currency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Delay?

DELAY!

Delay my @ZZ, REPEAL, de-fund, and deprive these agencies of the fiction they are empowered to create “law” without the express approval of congress.

This whole mess would be almost entirely avoided if congress were not allowed to skirt our constitution and their duty by delegating the authority to create law by “Implementing regulation’s” to the alphabet agencies.

There are very good reasons why creating law is supposed to be difficult, congress has been ducking their responsibility for decades.
If any law is not worth congress time to consider and vote on, it is not worth enacting.

Disband the alphabets, repeal 99% of existing “Law”, and make congress do their job properly to slow the return of the Fed. leviathan!


15 posted on 09/03/2011 4:47:53 PM PDT by Loyal Sedition (Loyal Sedition, often described as "To the right of Attila The Hun"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daler; upchuck
...where are the votes to defUnd Obamacare?

Trying to get elected to the Senate. We need to keep the House and win the Senate and Presidency.

16 posted on 09/03/2011 4:50:46 PM PDT by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

I like this idea. Just keep chipping away at the problems, instead of trying to do everything all at once.


17 posted on 09/03/2011 5:03:52 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
Republicans:You don't have to vote to repeal anything.

Just don't provide any funding!

Got it - it's easy?

18 posted on 09/03/2011 5:47:14 PM PDT by FroggyTheGremlim (Democrats: the Party of NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Call me when they get rid of the light bulb ban.


19 posted on 09/03/2011 6:00:48 PM PDT by ebshumidors ( Marksmanship and YOUR heritage http://www.appleseedinfo.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
I don't give a rat's rump about any new effin’ laws. I want repeal of existing laws.Preferably surgical removals that leave no traces of the bureaucracy and regulations the law spawned left behind.
While I'm dreaming I may as well go all out and demand the repeal of the 17th Amendment And implementation of the FAIR
tax.I have a dream......
20 posted on 09/03/2011 7:55:06 PM PDT by WePledge (Ich werde fur immer ein Hollenhund werden. Semper Fidelis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson