Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bitt

Seems to me - if the “personal calendar” of any state employee is kept/maintained on equipment paid for by the citizens of that state - it by default becomes a “public” record and subject to inspection.

On the flip side - if it is fact NOT a public record and not subject to rules of disclosure, why is a government employee using state assets for personal benefit?

Improper/unauthorized use of government equipment is often grounds for discipline, up to/including termination & pension forfeiture.

Just sayin’.


9 posted on 08/14/2011 11:45:14 AM PDT by Sylvester McMonkey McBean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sylvester McMonkey McBean

but even many here, tell us this is a waste of time,
and we should ignore evidence of crime and coverup,
and simply focus like a laser, on Obama’s record...

never mind foolish questions, like how he got a CT SSN...


13 posted on 08/14/2011 11:54:37 AM PDT by Elendur (It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it goes. - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Sylvester McMonkey McBean

“Seems to me - if the “personal calendar” of any state employee is kept/maintained on equipment paid for by the citizens of that state - it by default becomes a “public” record and subject to inspection.”

Seems to me the calendar would be similar to an official timesheet or even travel vouchers for state business in that they are all accounting for the employee’s time and whereabouts. All of these types of documents should be public records as they effectively provide an “audit trail” of employee activities. Seems pretty straightforward to me.


28 posted on 08/14/2011 12:37:51 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson