Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Court Documents Claim Sinaloa “Cartel” Is Protected by US Government(Another DOJ Scandle!)
The Narcosphere ^ | July 31, 2011 | Bill Conroy

Posted on 08/04/2011 1:00:11 PM PDT by Species8472

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
Guns south and drugs north, exact repeat of the Clinton's drug running operation in the 1980’s.

I stuck my nose where it didn't belong with that operation in the 80’s and had at least 3 attempts against my life.

If what he's saying is true, this is a Clinton operation and you can bet the CIA has their fingers in it too.

41 posted on 08/04/2011 2:42:23 PM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: StormEye
The guy claims he was allowed to smuggle cocaine from 2004 to 2009. (see post #33)
42 posted on 08/04/2011 2:47:06 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive
I wonder if the Sinola “Family” was the one receiving the guns that the BATF was illegally smuggling into Mexico?

Yes. And note that the BATF, who was running F&F, was not mentioned in the charge -- while the "DOJ and its agencies, the DEA and FBI" were.

So far as the BATF people in the field knew, they were "tracking a gunrunning operation". They didn't know that the DEA and the FBI were furnishing the cash, that the DOJ was actually running the deal as a political operation aimed at the 2nd Amendment and that the arms were actually going to a single favored cartel -- who was shipping unhindered into Chicago.

Do you see enough points of concern in that single paragraph to get really, really pissed off?

43 posted on 08/04/2011 2:51:53 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

“Is there an extensive group of corrupt officials, Democratic and Republican, behind the drug smuggling?”

Our government has had its fingers in the drug running pie for at least 40 years now, so logically, people from both parties have to be involved.


44 posted on 08/04/2011 2:59:23 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hellbender

“This sounds remarkably similar to the deal Whitey Bulger had...”

What is most worrisome to me is that we only find out about the most sensational of these arrangements, like the one Bulger or this cartel had. This is a basic police tactic though, so there must be thousands and thousands of these deals being made with lesser criminals across the country. If the police bust a small time dealer, they offer him a deal to rat out someone else, who they pressure to rat on someone else, etc.

Now, once the cops have made a deal with a criminal like this, he often becomes a professional informant, who the police will call on when they need information, and the informant can be rewarded for this service in a number of ways. The biggest benefit for the criminal, though, is the protection the police now offer him. He can rely on his “guardian angels” on the force to turn a blind eye to his criminal activities, and to help get him out of trouble if someone else arrests him. Of course, in order to keep this protected status, they have to keep providing information, even if they need to make something up. So, now you have already unreliable witnesses being given even more motivation to provide the police with false information.

The technique might be useful sometimes, but I think it’s just too dangerous to put police “in bed” with the criminals like this. Especially when the police are using the informant’s anonymous and unreliable testimony to get warrants sworn on people, so they can kick in doors with their paramilitary gear and shoot family pets.


45 posted on 08/04/2011 3:11:29 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
Is there an extensive group of corrupt officials, Democratic and Republican, behind the drug smuggling?

Stupid me. That only occurred to me last night. Everyone wants to blame Fast and Furious on ideology. What if it's just about the money?

46 posted on 08/04/2011 3:15:23 PM PDT by Stentor ( "All cults of personality begin as high drama and end as low comedy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Boop the Kittehs!

Did You Donate To Free Republic?
Ha Ha Ha! Of Course!


Become a New Monthly Donor and End FReepathons Forever

47 posted on 08/04/2011 3:19:07 PM PDT by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
I agree with everything you say. Things get really ugly when some corrupt political figure or cop arranges for one of these pet informants to give false testimony against an innocent person who has offended some authority figure.

Personally, I think corrupt FBI agent John Connally should have been executed for murder, but they don't have the death penalty in MA. Also, the problem with Connally is that he came from the same sleazy background as Bulger, whom he even knew as a kid. That's true of too many cops: in urban Demonrat areas, the police dept. has traditionally been a jobs program for white trash, to put it bluntly.

48 posted on 08/04/2011 5:43:01 PM PDT by hellbender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

>Is there an extensive group of corrupt officials, Democratic and Republican, behind the drug smuggling?

There is a high probability this is so; remember to Mr. Cash-in-my-freezer? (The cash was supplied and marked by the FBI [IIRC] to prove allegations of bribery.)


49 posted on 08/04/2011 5:44:59 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: IMR 4350
IMO this is indeed the genesis of this situation. It all dates back the Clinton* era of co-operation with the traffickers.

"Mena" was only a small part of what was going on.
50 posted on 08/05/2011 2:28:39 AM PDT by Tainan (Cogito Ergo Conservitus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

“Is there an extensive group of corrupt officials, Democratic and Republican, behind the drug smuggling?...”

funny you should ask...

http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/MENA/mena.php


51 posted on 08/05/2011 2:35:47 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tainan
I have no doubt the Clinton's are involved, the time frame when it allegedly started, 2004, looks suspicious to me.

After 9/11 I began to suspect Bush made a deal with the Mexican drug lords somewhat similar to the deal FDR made with the Mafia during WWII.

During WWII FDR made a deal with the Mafia to protect the docks from sabotage. It worked. Once the Mafia had control of the docks, sabotage stopped.

After 9/11 I think Bush made a deal with the Mexican drug lords to keep terrorist from coming up through the southern border, in exchange Bush wouldn't seal the border.

I think that is the opening they found and they used it.

I might be wrong, but this appears to be just like the dope running into Mena with Iran-Contra. They couldn't stop the dope running without exposing Iran-Contra, they couldn't stop this without exposing the deal Bush made with the drug lords. If it is exposed it's all on Bush.

52 posted on 08/05/2011 7:21:48 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: rednek

AGREE!

I want to see evidence of ALL the $ kickbacks to govt officials in this brilliant War on Drugs latest fiasco!
Don’t tell me that this effort to curb Drugs illegally coming into the US is just an anomaly.

DEA SWAT teams shooting our veterans in their homes...and the Justice Dept wheeling and dealing cocaine on the side and Homeland Security says our borders are secure....LIES AND MORE LIES.


53 posted on 08/05/2011 4:06:36 PM PDT by Recovering Ex-hippie (where is the Great Santini when we need him??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS

You are 100% on target. It’s all about money. Period!


54 posted on 08/05/2011 8:26:27 PM PDT by tefis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: IMR 4350

Mena was ugly!


55 posted on 08/05/2011 8:37:25 PM PDT by tefis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Stentor

That’s what I think. It’s all about money!


56 posted on 08/05/2011 8:39:29 PM PDT by tefis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: tefis
(Another DOJ Scandle!)

Is that like a cross between a scanner and a handle?

57 posted on 08/05/2011 8:48:55 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER ( Liberals, nothing more than bald haired hippies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson