The evidence was suggestive, not conclusive and in now way warranted the reaction it received from the cops.
The outcome supports my opinion, not yours.
I swear I don’t know why some ignore all logic when defending the police.
Proved to be innocent? Where does it say this guy was prosecuted or even arrested for anything?
The feds, while conducting an investigation into the distribution and receipt of child pornography, served a lawfully obtained search warrant and effected a search of the man's home based on information that it turns out is later proven to be 100% accurate - The man owned the internet connection that was used to download child pornography.
I don't know how much simpler it can be. You're either being argumentative or obtuse, I really don't care which it is.