[Fred Nerks]

It is possible since children of mixed race couples can have varying degrees of lightness/darkness. The difference in ages in the one with all four, also may not be that significant....can't tell.

If the younger child Ruth is holding is Mark, and both children DID have the same parents, the darker child, being several years older...who is he?

Mark has a more pronounced widow's peak than the younger toddler, but the younger toddler does have a slight one. These photos of obama also shows a slight widow's peak.

That's not a lot to go on...at least Mark resembles his father -

It appears Sr. and Stanley both have slight widow's peaks with Stanley's being more pronounced.

If you mean Stanley Armour Dunham, I see no resembalance:

I can't wrap my head around "why" or "how" the boy associated with David could be "zero". Mark would have to be older than zero. Ruth would have had to meet Sr. earlier than SAD. Why would zero be in the photo with Sr's family? How could Mark pull off saying/getting by with being that much older without it being known by someone?

That difficulty only exists because the MYTH requires you to see the older, darker boy in the family group as MARK...where-as MARK is the younger, lighter child she is holding.

Why would either SAD or Ruth be involved with the other's child? zero and David DO look a lot alike - if they have the same father, that makes sense. zero looks a lot like Stanley, as well.

There must have been a time when zero, as a little boy was sitting next to the darker, older child. The question remains, where was that photograph of the two little boys taken? Their ages are ONLY MONTHS APART. They CANNOT BE BROTHERS.

Nothing about obama or his "biography" totally adds up. What do you think is the "Why" behind David/zero being the same person? IOW, what was the purpose of there being a David in the Ruth/Sr family, if he didn't exist?

That's what I am trying to understand. There were three little boys. It seems the baby-sitter was telling the truth when she said she babysat for ANNA OBAMA when her own daughter was 18 months old. Her daughter was born in July 1959. That places the baby-sitting in JANUARY 1961.

Stanley Ann Dunham would have been still in High School when THAT child was conceived.

[Girlene]

That's not a lot to go on.[the widow's peak]..at least Mark resembles his father - Agree on both points.

That difficulty only exists because the MYTH requires you to see the older, darker boy in the family group as MARK...where-as MARK is the younger, lighter child she is holding.

I don't see it. The darker child looks like Mark (although it IS a fairly blurry photo).

That's what I am trying to understand. There were three little boys. It seems the baby-sitter was telling the truth when she said she babysat for ANNA OBAMA when her own daughter was 18 months old. Her daughter was born in July 1959. That places the baby-sitting in JANUARY 1961. Stanley Ann Dunham would have been still in High School when THAT child was conceived.

Yes, I've seen that, but how does this add up with SAD showing up with a baby that her friend in Washington remembers in August, 1961?

Are you saying there were two mothers in Washington, or that the friend she visited in August was wrong about that memory?......or something else?