Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin Says “It’s Time A Woman Became President of the United States”
gateway pundit ^ | 3/19/2011 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 03/19/2011 10:18:33 AM PDT by unseen1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 301-311 next last
To: unseen1

How are they not being treated equally? Is a government agency keeping them from entering?

Or do you think that female candidates should not be evaluated and criticized like their male counterparts? Does being treated equally to you mean that criticism shouldnt be allowed?

As for your final question, I dont deal in hypotheticals. They arent real.

I believe Palin would be better than Obama.


141 posted on 03/19/2011 11:33:45 AM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: definitelynotaliberal

This is good to know. It makes a difference.


142 posted on 03/19/2011 11:34:21 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: USSR Didnt Fall

Sorry, I just posted to you without indicating to what I was referring.

Here’s what I meant:

There are some things that a politician should not joke about. One of those things is identity politics as applied to that particular politician.

Palin should know this.


143 posted on 03/19/2011 11:34:59 AM PDT by fightinJAG (I am sick of people adding comments to titles in the title box. Thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver
you opposed to her no matter what she says or does

Well, if that's true. Sarah Palin has yet to win those people over. Perhaps her strategy needs some changing?

Remember, It's up to the candidate to convince the voters.

144 posted on 03/19/2011 11:35:01 AM PDT by tsowellfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: chris37; newgeezer
The genetalia of said person isn’t important.

That's what Methodists say about pastors.

145 posted on 03/19/2011 11:35:51 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (My dad put his arm around me like that once, to this very day he wears orthopedic shirts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957

I just cant stand the term RINO. Its just a lazy argument in my opinion.

“I’ll call you a name and that way the debate can be ended without substance.”


146 posted on 03/19/2011 11:36:57 AM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
As do I. the reverse is also true is it not. I don't like someone saying they should not be something just because of what gender they are.

Most of the ABP folks entire argument comes down to she is a woman and therefore unpresidential and lacking gravitas....because what is more unpresidential than being a woman? which is the exactly what ROVe his saying when he attacks her as being unpresidential. Name another candidate that has had that attack line thrown at them.

147 posted on 03/19/2011 11:37:09 AM PDT by unseen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
Perhaps that's what she was thinking

We can make assumptions on what Palin "means" all we want. That doesn't change the statement.

148 posted on 03/19/2011 11:37:56 AM PDT by SaveTheChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: bwc2221
Well, when I look around the GOP I don’t see (m)any males s who aren’t squishes

Sorry, but that's the dumbest justification for identity politics I've heard yet.

Why don't you just vote for a black man, any black man, because when you look around all the white men you see are squishes?

Please.

149 posted on 03/19/2011 11:37:57 AM PDT by fightinJAG (I am sick of people adding comments to titles in the title box. Thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam
found Rand Paul and Paul Ryan are RINOs threads.

It is Ok to call someone a RINO if they say something you don't like , didn't you know? :).
150 posted on 03/19/2011 11:39:40 AM PDT by kroll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: chris37

Very well said. I, too, will look elsewhere.


151 posted on 03/19/2011 11:39:59 AM PDT by Lando Lincoln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

LOL, before I’d read downthread, I posted the same thing in response: You know this how?

Then I went back and clarified.


152 posted on 03/19/2011 11:40:07 AM PDT by fightinJAG (I am sick of people adding comments to titles in the title box. Thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: unseen1

You want someone who kept $12 billion in the government coffers as opposed to in the free market?


153 posted on 03/19/2011 11:40:12 AM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: unseen1
The only thing missing from some of these posts is...

"Some of my best friends are women."

154 posted on 03/19/2011 11:40:47 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (I am declaring 2011 the year of ME.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam; catfish1957

The forum is very guilty of RINO creep.

It has taken on the definition of “any one that doesn’t fit within the parameters of my extremely narrow minded views.”


155 posted on 03/19/2011 11:40:56 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. D.E. +12 ....( History is a process, not an event ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG

No, that key is broken :)


156 posted on 03/19/2011 11:41:09 AM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Just A Nobody

Thats what Im thinking.


157 posted on 03/19/2011 11:41:43 AM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

May be true, but then vote for these women because of what they stand for and how they pursue it, not because “it’s time for a woman President.”

The fangirly segment of Palin’s base is not doing her any favors, IMHO.


158 posted on 03/19/2011 11:42:02 AM PDT by fightinJAG (I am sick of people adding comments to titles in the title box. Thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
To 25 - Mrs Palin was (regrettably) serious in her statement. Hardly "tongue in cheek".
It's pathetic how some of her supporters blatantly lie about her or things she has said or done.
And if she's going to bring up former presidents she might consider a little less Lincoln and a lot more Jefferson.
159 posted on 03/19/2011 11:42:11 AM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Emerson C

Too bad, that’s the way it goes in politics.

A politician has to have some sense of what will make the headline and this boneheaded, unnuanced statement was bound to.


160 posted on 03/19/2011 11:44:02 AM PDT by fightinJAG (I am sick of people adding comments to titles in the title box. Thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 301-311 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson