Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
We don’t need this chicken sh!t for President.
2 posted on
02/22/2011 2:07:29 PM PST by
Dr. Thorne
(Buy Gold and Guns Now!)
To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
ba bye 2012 Mitch. Nice never getting to know ya
3 posted on
02/22/2011 2:07:40 PM PST by
wilco200
(11/4/08 - The Day America Jumped the Shark)
To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
What a jerk. The Democrat minority may have a “right to express its views,” but that doesn’t mean it has a right to get its way.
4 posted on
02/22/2011 2:08:40 PM PST by
livius
To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
Is Daniels the same one who said we needed to call a “truce” on social issues? He’s quickly losing the goodwill he gained from CPAC.
To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
Eunichs have more stones.
6 posted on
02/22/2011 2:09:03 PM PST by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
Daniels' remarks in the article...
I trust that peoples consciences will bring them back to work and I choose to believe that our friends in the minority will, having made their point, will come back and do their duty and the jobs they are paid to do.
He thinks Dems will play nice in the sandbox. What a sweet kid. Anybody tell him yet that Santa isn't real?
7 posted on
02/22/2011 2:10:02 PM PST by
GQuagmire
(Hey now!)
To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
Another sniveling RINO!!!!!
8 posted on
02/22/2011 2:11:10 PM PST by
mongo141
To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
This is not a leader. This is a gutless, “please like me” follower.
9 posted on
02/22/2011 2:11:32 PM PST by
pogo101
To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
Let me get something straight here. I keep hearing about these governors “sending out the state police to retrieve these missing democrats”. We know they are in another state so what in the hell are the trooper going to do, go to the state line and wait??? I don't think state police from one state have any jurisdiction in the next. So to me this is all just bull crap. Not that I don't want these rats exterminated but this rhetoric is stupid to me.
10 posted on
02/22/2011 2:11:54 PM PST by
fish hawk
(R. Emmett Tyrrell: Liberalism is dead. What we see now is "soft Nazis-ism".)
To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
And some people want him to be the Republican nominee for President? NO THANKS!
To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
Ugh! Thanks for nothing, Mitch!
12 posted on
02/22/2011 2:12:32 PM PST by
good old days
(God bless Sarah Palin.)
To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
Mitch, I’d like to take this opportunity to thank you for proving to everyone precisely why I never wanted to support you for president. Kthxbye.
14 posted on
02/22/2011 2:13:40 PM PST by
perfect_rovian_storm
(The worst is behind us. Unfortunately it is really well endowed.)
To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
Carl Rove’s new butt boy proves that he is unworthy of conservative support.
16 posted on
02/22/2011 2:15:23 PM PST by
Mr. Jazzy
(HA! Not even Bill Maher thinks Odumbo is a Christian! HAHAHAHAHA!)
To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
Daniels said in December that he sees the merit in the right to work laws that 22 states now have on their books.
Let me say, theres a lot to recommend this. It does hold us back economically, theres no doubt about that, he said.
The governor said the state loses out on perhaps as many as a quarter of the deals in which businesses are competing states off against each other to decide where to relocate.
So its a very legitimate issue, he said.
But, he said, he told legislative leaders in the Republican-led House and Senate that he would prefer they not address the issue this year.
I think its too big to do without having discussed it out in the open first. And, I will also say that I think it would have the potential, just tactically, to possibly reduce or wreck the chances for education reform and local government reform and criminal justice reform and the things that we have a wonderful chance to do, he said.
“So thats my point of view. I would say to the folks who believe in this, youve got good reasons, but get out there and share them. Build a case. Visit with our fellow citizens about why this is a good idea. If you persuade them, youll be able to prevail in the right way and the right time.
Whether Daniels has changed his mind on the issue is unclear. His press secretary said he is unavailable for interviews today.
http://www.courierpress.com/news/2011/feb/22/statehouse-fight-one-daniels-didnt-want/
To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
Mitch can shove it up his a$$!
18 posted on
02/22/2011 2:17:17 PM PST by
NoGrayZone
(Hell really is a bottomless pit of fire. Which side of the line are you going to choose? Palin/West)
To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
I’ve already heard enough from the locals that Daniels bends over for the DUmocrats. My mind was made up on this asshat within six months of assuming office.
19 posted on
02/22/2011 2:17:35 PM PST by
RasterMaster
(We the tax-payer subsidize DUh-bama's failures)
To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
20 posted on
02/22/2011 2:18:48 PM PST by
bvw
To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
SIT DOWN, SHUT UP, AND GET THE F*** OUT OF THE WAY MITCH.
To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
And that is the end of his already-slim hopes of becoming President.
Fork time.
To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
Mitch Daniels next career will be as PR spokesman for The New Castrati
23 posted on
02/22/2011 2:21:39 PM PST by
bigbob
(-)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson