It's really getting that way. The problem is that they have gone from this:
To this:
Incidentally, you do realise by following that advice you forfeit all right to complain about soaring crime figures, falling detection rates, and spiralling police costs?
It's really getting that way. The problem is that they have gone from this:
To this:
“Incidentally, you do realise by following that advice you forfeit all right to complain about soaring crime figures, falling detection rates, and spiralling police costs?”
How does not talking to cops without legal counsel present cause soaring crime? After all, the Donut Eaters would then spend less time grilling and entrapping citizens and might then spend more time catching criminals.
Well, that won’t happen, but I can hope.
Then, how does an innocent person not speaking to the Donut Eaters cause falling detection rates? Many crimes are solved not by “detective skills” but by blabbermouth crooks and informants.
Police cost are out of control because the police departments are out of control. Wages and benefits are astronomical.
Please, spare me the badge-lapper bit about the risks Donut Eaters take. Being a LEO (formal nomenclature for a Donut Eater) means one’s job doesn’t even make the ten most dangerous occupations according to the Department of Labor stats.