Replies

Yes, I react that way sometimes to condescending assumptions.

Ahhh, yes, when all else fails, accuse the person you disagree with of being condescending. Of course, you never make condescending assumptions. Nevermind these statements of yours to me on this very thread:

You and the other few Palin haters here are the cult with slavish devotion to your dislike of Palin.
Do you have any problems with the nastiness of the left?

I don't hate Palin. I don't dislike her. I am unalterably opposed to the Left and have been my entire adult life. My early posts on this thread made it clear I agree with her statement, even the use of the term blood libel. However, I disagree with your purist thought on the margins. Oh the horror! Oh the humanity! Can't have even marginal divergence of thought, now can we.

Nevermind these statements of yours to me on this very thread:
You and the other few Palin haters here are the cult with slavish devotion to your dislike of Palin.

That was a reaction to your broad brush of Palin supporters having "...near slavish devotion to Sarah Palin here... It is a cult..."

Sometimes you get your words thrown back at you. I usually don't let those foolish childish accusations stand if I see them.

They just stir the pot and just degrade a thread when they are posted.

I think it is legitimate question if you have a problem with the nastiesnes of the left, as you used it as a label of the some posts here.

I myself hate nastiness on either side, but it sure is a lot more vitrolic on the other side.

Purist thoughts on the margin?

Think what you want, I have stated I have no propblem with you stating your opinions.

Oh The Hugh Manatee!

Thanks for clearing up a few things, I'm all for a truce