Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What a War Between China and the United States Would Look Like
Popular Mechanics ^ | December 29, 2010 | Erik Sofge

Posted on 12/30/2010 6:38:56 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-137 next last
To: sauropod

mark


81 posted on 12/30/2010 8:08:51 AM PST by sauropod (The truth shall make you free but first it will make you miserable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borax Queen

‘....chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, added that he has “moved from being curious to being genuinely concerned” about the buildup.’

If he was only “curious” before, he’s a g-d idiot, and he’s definitely a g-d idiot for saying it.


82 posted on 12/30/2010 8:16:32 AM PST by Williams (It's the policies, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

“There is zero chance that the US will fight to save Taiwan, and this has been true for many years.”

Jim, you’re one of the few folks around here who sees things as they are — not through prisms of liberalism OR of conservatism, but simply [again] “as they are”.

Although they remain “apart” politically, in the years since Mao’s death the nations of China and Taiwan have grown much more “alike”. Both are now capitalistic-minded nations, albeit with different governmental control structures.

I wouldn’t be surprised to see China make an offer directly to the people of Taiwan to reunite with the mainland under the same principles and options that were offered to those of Hong Kong. If such an offer were made, I would expect the principal opponents to it on the Taiwan side would be the elites and governing classes, who would of course lose their power and control. But I would wager that the majority of Taiwanese would assent to such a scenario.

I also see some kind of “grand exchange” to be offered by China in the future.

China wants Taiwan, to reunify the Chinese people. But such deals can’t be sealed without quid pro quo. What can China “offer” to “free Asia” in return?

Answer: North Korea, the outlaw state that has been under China’s wing for 60 years.

But the ideologies that once were similar to both countries have changed to the point where North Korea must be a continuing headache for the Chinese.

As China has moved to be more similar to Taiwan (than in the past), North Korea has moved 180 degrees to the opposite of its southern sister. NK has become a danger not only to South Korea but to the entire civilized world through its export of weapons, including nuclear proliferation technology. Unchecked, at some point it must be brought to heel, by whatever means possible.

But NK cannot exist without Chinese support, and without it must quickly collapse and capitulate.

China could intentionally decapitate the North Korean government and military, forcing it into “peace talks” with the South Koreans that will be nothing more than cover for a veiled transition of control to the South.

..... IN EXCHANGE for “reunification talks” with the Republic of Taiwan, whose conclusions will be foregone.

Hence, the “Grand Exchange” of Asia.


83 posted on 12/30/2010 8:21:59 AM PST by Grumplestiltskin (I may look new, but it's only deja vu!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

“....and there are no reliable U.S. defenses against it” = and I call BS. =.=


84 posted on 12/30/2010 8:22:13 AM PST by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glenn

You got that right. There won’t be any war between us and China over Taiwan for the next two years anyway.

Obama would give Taiwan to China in a minute, and I think China knows it.


85 posted on 12/30/2010 8:23:55 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73
We have ,many more assets in the region than are publicly known, and Japan would VERY quickly become a major player.

What's wrong with the scenario outlined above is that it assumes that everything China does works and goes right, while everything we do goes wrong. That is possible--but not likely.
86 posted on 12/30/2010 8:24:39 AM PST by Antoninus (Fair warning: If Romney's the GOP nominee in 2012, I'm looking for a new party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

“But China’s goal was never to trigger an extended, costly, bloody contest of superpowers.”

Sorta like how Japan thought. “If we sink the fleet at Pearl Harbor, the Americans will quickly back down.”

This is always a silly fantasy the enemies have. That if the Nimitz limps home a smoldering wreck from a sneak attack,, that Americans will quickly negotiate a settlement.While our nation appears limp-wristed, the world would be stunned at an American response to an outright military attack. ANd while Obama might not, every other president would probably launch ICBMs.

Thats the essential value of nuclear weapons. Realistically, you have no latitude anymore to launch conventional warfare against a nuclear power.

Not to mention, the instant they tried this, their loans to us are voided, and their biggest markety vanishes overnight. Did Lockheed write this fantasy to sell more stuff? The chineses “launch” button is actually an “instant destroy the chinese economy button”.


87 posted on 12/30/2010 8:31:02 AM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

Which brings up the point, will China see the need to act before Obummer is removed from office?


88 posted on 12/30/2010 8:38:48 AM PST by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

At the time we could credibly claim we would defend them if the time came. Does anybody believe Obama has that kind of credibility now? None of these events would have happened under Bush because his tough talkin’ cowboy image reeked “I’ll kick your ass if you cross me.” What does our bicycle helmet wearing metro sexual reek of? I would have taken his lunch money and held it until lunch time just to stop the bullies from getting it.


89 posted on 12/30/2010 8:42:20 AM PST by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
every other president would probably launch ICBMs

No American President would EVER nuke land targets in response to an attack on warships.

That's been the fallacy of the carrier battle group for years and years.

Any conflict in which CBGs could play a role would result in the CBGs being sunk in fifteen minutes with nuclear weapons.

And the idea that a Soviet (or Chicom) attack on a seaborne military target would lead to us trading Los Angeles for Beijing is just absurd.

A land attack that killed civilians - sure. A clean kill in the middle of the ocen - not a chance.

If Bush didn't attack Tora Bora with ICBMs, you can dismiss it as a possibility under your scenario. THIS isn't an Obama problem - our weakness has been apparent for years.

90 posted on 12/30/2010 8:46:33 AM PST by Jim Noble (Re-elect Palin 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
I believe if China were to go after Taiwan, they would take the leash of the NORK’s at the same time. Basically creating a two front conflict in the hopes of possibly dividing our Asian-Pacific forces. We would then sacrifice Taiwan and try to save what is left of South Korea.
91 posted on 12/30/2010 8:56:35 AM PST by A Texan (Oderint dum metuant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mohresearcher

“As the greatest US general said in 1951”

You surely cannot mean MacArthur? He was a singularly incompetent general,,, probably a strong candidate for all time worst. His strongest trait was shameless self promotion and having his mommy promote him to politicians. He is not in the class of Grant, Patton, Pershing, Custer, Sherman, Ike, Kreuger, Bradley, Schwartzkopf, etc. If you want a great example,, Ridgeway who relieved him was so superior it is nearly embarrassing.

His defense of the PI was utterly amateurish, his slugfests in the pacific murdered tons of good men and wasted resources. They contributed very little to the ultimate outcome of the War. They had to give dugout doug a task where he couldn’t do much damage, but appear to be using him.

His vaunted landing at Inchon was something that would have been done by anyone who happened to have access to a Marine division and map. As the forces wiped out north Korea, his poor analysis and understanding of the situation are what triggered China to enter the war. His poor generalship and silly moves convinced China we intended not to stop at the border, and were going to cross into Manchuria.

Realistically, Without MacArthur, the Korean war would have been a 5 month war with no Chinese intervention,,,and it would have ended with a “Korea”.


92 posted on 12/30/2010 8:57:30 AM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: darth
You have some very interesting and valid points. We have not had the need to show all of our cards in terms of military/cybor power in a long long time. The Chinese would face some very interesting and unseen problems. My worry would be either the North Koreans taking advantage of the opportunity or China giving them the go-a-head to go after the South. I am not sure we have the resources in the Pacific to handle both in the short term.
93 posted on 12/30/2010 9:05:54 AM PST by A Texan (Oderint dum metuant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: mohresearcher

And it’s sickening that he got a MOH for spending a few months underground in Corregidor and then leaving his men to their fate.

Those men would have never BECOME trapped in the Bataan peninsula in the hands of a competent general. He Faced forces smaller, weaker, and less logistically supported than his. So he “Generalled” them into about the only place the Japanese could have corned them into a siege. The Japanes General was amazed, and was utterly unprepared for the surrender of an entire army. They thought they were in for a tough battle. He stabbed those men in the back.


94 posted on 12/30/2010 9:08:20 AM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
the U.S. president orders the Nimitz and its escorts to the Taiwan Strait

Wrong. Obama sends an apology to Beijing.

95 posted on 12/30/2010 9:09:05 AM PST by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|Why are TSA exempt from their own searches?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

Your analysis was spot on, Obamas weakness in response to the CHinese invasion and the Norks sinking a warship has made the entire region FAR more dangerous.

The truth is that a war over Taiwan will not happen in a normal era. But the likelihood of it in the next two years is sky high, as the CHicoms correctly judge that Obama would slink away. His weakness encourages aggression.


96 posted on 12/30/2010 9:13:59 AM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

“Send every conscript home with his rifle, as the Swiss do.”

Best idea ever. I read an article once that explained it better than i can. But such a plan is horrifyingly effective for defense. A universally armed populace who are good with rifles. The only downside is that it is not too good for projecting power like a conventional military.

But for all the talk of the naysayers, a rifle armed populace is the ultimate in invasion prevention.


97 posted on 12/30/2010 9:20:13 AM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: darth

IOW, RF magnetic field blast (a nuclear device detonated high enough above earth to create a massive magnetic field distortion) which would disable China’s satellites and their electronics on the ground. And financial and economic sabotage. Provided, as you have indirectly implied, we had a leadership chain in place capable of issuing the order.


98 posted on 12/30/2010 9:23:14 AM PST by 4Runner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Glenn

Obama would call for restraint on both sides.


99 posted on 12/30/2010 9:26:20 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Good afternoon.

It's fun to war game. Even if you're a Grunt.

Methinks the Japanese have both fuel and design for a nuke. An outlier in the above game maybe the Japanese put one together in 6 weeks, amend the Constitution, and test.

My bet is the Chicoms and Norks (not in the above scenario either), would sh#t their collective pants.

5.56mm

100 posted on 12/30/2010 9:39:06 AM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-137 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson