Wow. Do you honestly believe that? You think that Scalia, Thomas, Robert and Alito - the guy who rebuked Obama at his own State of the Union address - all "conspired" to do anything for Barack Obama?
Those four wouldn't piss on on Obama if he was on fire on the steps of the Supreme Court building. What you allege is so facially absurd, it borders on insane.
Good luck with your totally "OLD" naivity of thinking and seeing everything with rosy eyes and your head well stuck into the sand!!!
You ever heard about YOUR dear puppet master george Soros and his NWO. BTW, seems like the "big kahuna" here agrees with me???
Three of those 4 met in an ex parte meeting with Obama when SCOTUS was supposed to confer on cases about Obama’s eligibility a couple days and about a week later.
The invitation to Obama to meet with SCOTUS came from Chief Justice Roberts on the SAME DAY that SCOTUS refused to hear Donofrio’s case. An invitation that had never before been given by ANY SCOTUS justice, much less a SCOTUS Chief Justice who knew he would have several cases to confer about.
One of those justices said straight out that SCOTUS was “evading” the issue - not something a conservative justice would boast about, so his saying it was apparently for some other reason.
Another one of those justices refused to be at that ex parte meeting with Obama, and acted to Orly Taitz as if he knew nothing of the eligibility cases they had supposedly already conferred on, and then gave her an “aside” implying they were missing one vote.
Another justice - not among those you mentioned - said to Joe Biden after administering the oath, “Congratulations, Mr President”.
Chief Justice Roberts rushed through the oath so it was screwed up and was only completed in private with no video made and with the same crew of people who were responsible for the forged COLB and the threats to the media heads acting as witnesses.
And it’s not just the SCOTUS justices who have anomalies in regards to the eligibility cases. Judge David Carter was acting in earnest in regards to Taitz’ case until he suddenly hired as his clerk a guy from Obama’s defense company - an ethics breach.
Judge Robertson actually claimed that Twitter had legally decided the case before him. If ever there was an ex parte communication, Twitter would be it. For a judge to cite Twitter in a court of law is beyond the pale.
The timing of a bunch of things are very, very uncanny. The run on the bank was undoubtedly done by Soros when the polls were in a dead heat after McCain chose Palin as his running-mate. I am almost positive that on Sept 24th Soros’ thugs called both GW Bush and John McCain and told them that if they resisted Obama’s coup Soros would make another run on the bank and collapse the entire western economy.
The result?
At 2:30pm McCain called Obama back and said he would write a joint statement saying they need to work together on the economy. As soon as McCain was off the phone he went on TV to say he was suspending his campaign (which Republican advisors said was crazy) and was asking that the first debate, scheduled for 2 days later, be postponed (which R advisors said was suicidal).
And Bush, who had been totally silent about TARP, letting the public and Congress deal with the strong feelings both for and against it, suddenly announced he would give a speech on it. In the speech he basically said if they don’t pass TARP the entire western economy would be destroyed. We know that the economy did fine for several months after that without TARP so the collapse Bush was talking about was not likely a natural collapse.
When neither Bush nor McCain blew the whistle on Soros he was emboldened to do the same thing elsewhere - to use the threat of collapsing the US and western capitalist economy in order to threaten patriots who love the country.
First to Judge Surick in the Berg case on Oct 15th, the same day that Rush Limbaugh made his first comment about Obama being in Hawaii and not responding to the Berg case as required. The next day Surick suddenly reversed his seeming attitude of earnestness and ruled that he was done with anything to do with the case. Period. That’s it.
Then, most probably sometime later that week, he met with the top media heads and threatened them with annihilation after the election if they reported on the eligibility issue. This is documented. The fact that these media heads ASSUMED that Obama would be elected, even though if these men had simply reported Obama’s threats Obama could have been sitting in jail rather than the White House, suggests to me that Soros had something he threatened them with that was not in any way dependent on Obama winning the election. The same thing he had threatened Bush, McCain, and Surick with: the threat of collapsing the US economy.
I believe at least Roberts and possibly the other conservative justices were threatened shortly before the Donofrio case, and that Roberts was so angered by it that he purposely, on the spot, invited Obama for an ex parte meeting that would serve as a red flag that something was seriously wrong. News about the invitation to Obama was reported before the SCOTUS denial of Donofrio’s case.
It was shortly after the SCOTUS meeting with Obama (2 days later) that Rush Limbaugh said that he hoped Obama would fail because Obama is trying to destroy the country. Rush had already speculated that democrats had prepared the way for Soros to make a run on the bank and that the dems had been surprised by how serious the situation was after it was all done. But at that point Rush made the point that not only were Obama’s policies going to destroy the country, but that Obama’s MOTIVE was to destroy the country.
Very interesting to me that Rush, whose 3rd wedding was officiated by the Justice who publicly stated that they were “evading” the eligibility issue, became the personal target for Obama to attack and try to destroy 2 days after that SCOTUS meeting, when Rush declared that Obama was trying to destroy the country.
I already know you’re going to say I’m crazy. I doubt that Rush would call me crazy. On Monday he was responding to a guy who talked about the Steelers giving Obama the game ball, and Rush said he knows a lot more about a lot of stuff than he can say publicly because he can’t betray the confidentiality of his friends. One of those close friends is Justice Thomas, and it’s interesting that Rush came out so strongly against Obama’s motives so soon after SCOTUS’ ex parte meeting with Obama (from which either Scalia or Alito chose to be absent; I always get those 2 mixed up).
There’s also much, much more that I could say about the particular timing of a lot of stuff, or about other connections involved, but you’ll call me crazy even if I made this post much longer with details to support my belief.
So I’ll just let you call me crazy. But there’s enough meat here to be pondered by those who have seriously wondered why it seems like good people have betrayed the Constitution. GW Bush himself did an absolute about-face on Sept 24th, at the same time as McCain did. And he went from being totally silent to proclaiming from the rooftops that the world as we know it was going to end if we didn’t pass TARP. Something happened on Sept 24th; that much is very clear.
I believe Soros is the key. And the fact that threats were made to the media heads tells the degree of boldness, even in dealing with Fox which by that time had exposed Obama’s communist history, etc. And yet what Soros threatened the media heads about was the eligibility issue.
The fact that Chavez and Castro immediately started saying, “Since CAPITALISM HAS FAILED, the world should try communism” speaks volumes. And Ahmadinejad and Al Qaeda started saying at the same time, “SINCE CAPITALISM HAS FAILED, the world should try Islamic finance.” And the IMF was meeting to decide whether CAPITALISM HAD FAILED. And GW Bush was suddenly saying that if they didn’t pass TARP, CAPITALISM WOULD FAIL.
That’s a lot of similar mantra from a lot of people all at the same time - all about whether or not capitalism could survive. Now there’s this French communist - Caputo? - who urged his followers to make a run on the bank to try to get CAPITALISM TO FAIL. Wonder where he got that idea from...
Glenn Beck has been concentrating on George Soros’ connections, and that’s probably what was behind this, but it was also interesting to me that just a couple days after I mentioned on my blog that I was wondering if Soros had threatened key conservatives with another run on the bank if they balked at the Obama coup, somebody here on FR posted an article about the European Court suddenly - after about 4 years of doing nothing - deciding to grant Soros’ appeal on his conviction of insider trading in France, which is something I mentioned to support my statement that Soros is recognized as an economic terrorist in many countries. Apparently Soros was suddenly willing to pay whatever it cost to have the bureaucrats change their minds on that.
It’s a theory. I can’t prove it, but there is a lot to support the plausibility of the theory. Stuff for serious minds to ponder.
“What you allege is so facially absurd, it borders on insane. ————————————————————————————————————————————
Hey Oldie, here’s some more insanity thoughts for the naive sanity “squatters”!!!
http://www.usofearth.com/2011-obamas-coup-fails.php