Hey, I like that. Compared to “revolution”, “restoration” is a relatively benign word. However, it encompasses the gamut of a peaceful political solution—i.e. voting the Marxists out at the ballot box—to a forceful revolution. Another component to the word is that it points no fingers that would arouse people’s defensive mechanisms.
I was speaking with my sister the other day. She rejects the Marxist label despite her belief that she has a right to other people’s money and everyone should earn equally. I try to steer clear of politics with her because all she does is parrot demrat talking points. In any case, she bemoaned that America is not what it was. My point is that even some of the demrat “useful idiots” are yearning for at some semblance of a retuen to traditional America. I think “restoration” is a word these folks will not deem offensive.
Where appropriate I will use the term “American Restoration” whenever I speak about taking back America. Maybe you and I, LomanBill, can start a trend.
When I read the writing on the walls of the Jefferson Memorial, I don't see any mention of any party - other than the implicit American one.What I see written there, are core American principles that must be understood and articulated if America is to be restored as per its original specification:"TO SECURE THESE RIGHTS, governments are instituted among men"
"NOTHING IS MORE CERTAINLY WRITTEN IN THE BOOK OF FATE THAN THAT THESE PEOPLE ARE TO BE FREE.
ESTABLISH THE LAW FOR EDUCATING THE COMMON PEOPLE.
THIS IT IS THE BUSINESS OF THE FREEPER TO EFFECT AND ON A GENERAL PLAN...."