Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: taxtruth

Only Congress has the power to remove a President, not the Courts.


3 posted on 12/02/2010 1:37:52 AM PST by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: SatinDoll

“Only Congress has the power to remove a President, not the Courts.”

Lakin is not calling for his removal........he is saying the pres does not have the authority to command/issue orders.


10 posted on 12/02/2010 4:18:16 AM PST by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: SatinDoll

And so long as we have congressmen like Senator Bennett , Senator Udall, and Congressman John Salazar (all of Colorado—
none of them with my support as they have not represented me)
Congress will continue as suggested by (I can’t remember his name)But in discussions several in Congress have declared until the courts mandate change-Congress has No intention to
remove this President. Bennett of Colorado insists the Courts have declared Obama is a “natural born citizen” I disagree but I am not in Congress-and have No power over the Court.


15 posted on 12/02/2010 5:02:35 AM PST by StonyBurk (ring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: SatinDoll

Maybe, but a court could find that he does not legally meet the qualifications to hold office in the first place.


20 posted on 12/02/2010 5:56:16 AM PST by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: SatinDoll

Congress will only remove obama when they are put in a position where they are forced to follow the U.S. Constitution. If the court( Supreme Court) could be forced to follow the original intent of the Constitution and declare that a Natural Born citizen requires both parents be U.S. citizens it would force Congress to VOID obama’s election. IT is not necessary to impeach obama as he is not a legal sitting President. If Sotomeir and Kagen had withdrawn from the voting( conflict of interest) the case could have moved forward. They have shown that they have no respect for the Constitution.


24 posted on 12/02/2010 6:46:37 AM PST by omegadawn (qualified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: SatinDoll
During the Viet Nam war there was an incident where a Fighter wing commander was initiating air strikes by reporting anti aircraft missle launches which were reason for a counterstrike against thes enemy positions. At the time first strike attacks were not allowed.

Air intelligence officers reported these "illegal command actions" to the Inspector General and the Wing Commander was court martialled for violating rules of engagement as set forth by LBJ. The Joint Chiefs issued a directive that said that it was proper to Not follow orders if the underling believed that the orders were improper or illegal.

Lakin's defense is that Obama is not a "LEGAL" Commander in Chief and Lakin has a duty to not follow these orders and to report the issue to the IG, in this case the Congress! He should call state certifiers to speak on the record and he should request evidence be presented, to wit THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE, for proof that Obama is a citizen entitled to hold the office of the President. Proof of citizenship and Lakin goes to jail. No proof then a fat lip for the Obaminator.

25 posted on 12/02/2010 7:48:54 AM PST by Young Werther ("Quae cum ita sunt" Since these things are so!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: SatinDoll
You are 1/2 right. Only Congress can remove an otherwise qualified President.

The Att'y Gen'l of the U.S. and the Att'y Gen'l of Washington, DC, can find him unqualified at any time through a process of quo warranto. If he is not found to be qualified after being inaugurated, the VP takes the job, all documents signed by the usurper are void, he has to return all renumeration paid him, and his name is stricken from the record as ever having served as President. Then the Senate, I believe, supplies a VP.

26 posted on 12/02/2010 8:36:11 AM PST by RideForever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: SatinDoll

Hush. You’re killing the buzz.


27 posted on 12/02/2010 10:07:42 AM PST by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson