Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GOPJ
They need to investigate to find out if releasing classified (and higher) information is against the law?

News alert!

Simply releasing classified information is only a crime if you have a security clearance. You agree to it when you are granted the clearance.

For everyone else, specific harm has to be shown. It's prosecuted under the Espionage Act, instead. And that's a pretty high threshold to meet, especially when all of the information released so far is not surprising.

14 posted on 11/30/2010 11:09:23 AM PST by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: justlurking

Wasn’t that a ruling connected to the release of the Pentagon Papers ? As it effected the New York Times? It seems to me that a law could be passed to cover the situation. I wonder why that hasn’t been done? Any ideas why liberals would want to keep this kind of ruling in place? Any reason the MSM would RATHER have the law the way it is - even if it’s hurts the country? Just asking...


58 posted on 11/30/2010 4:03:42 PM PST by GOPJ ('Power abdicates only under the stress of counter-power." Martin Buber /a Tea-nami's coming..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: justlurking

Oh - and I don’t believe in prior restraint with the press - but I do believe when a crime’s been committed, the justice department needs to act. Might be time to bring a new case before the SC.


59 posted on 11/30/2010 4:05:56 PM PST by GOPJ ('Power abdicates only under the stress of counter-power." Martin Buber /a Tea-nami's coming..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson