Posted on 11/18/2010 12:33:43 PM PST by markomalley
Here is one of the many screenshots that I got of Bristol’s Facebook page.
http://efreephoto.com/image-16604474294ce433132e382.htm
Calling her brother a ‘re re’, and Sarah a whore. Where are you TMZ? Not present.
Let me chime in here. I saw the first episode on the TLC repeat last night and I have to agree with indoor girl. The family was being filmed and all knew it. First the boyfriend disobeys her and sneaks up the stairs when he thinks Sarah isn't looking. She calls Willow on her cell phone (from downstairs to upstairs) and tells her to send him back down. The boy comes down and sits on the couch as of nothing happens. She doesn't say a word to him as if it didn't happen. She should have sent him home and then dealt with Willow who also had been told no boys upstairs.
Later in the family RV the girls are fighting and acting up, just being bratty and talking back to her. They are old enough to know better and it doesn't paint a pretty picture of Sarah's parenting skills and certainly doesn't endear the viewer to the family. So I wouldn't be a bit surprised if Willow turns up pregnant.
Well, in that case, since Willow is underage, and under Sarah’s roof, Sarah and/or Todd should toss Willow’s computer into Lake Lucille.
“and not be as polarizing as Bush or Palin”
Polarizing? You don’t want to be on the opposite pole from Evil?
If a candidate doesn’t drive the leftards into a slavering, convulsing, howling, puking, chewing-their-own-lips-off, full-blown “Exorcist” seizure, that candidate is not morally fit for office.
This is war, pooky. They want you dead. They might let you live as a slave, just so they’d have somebody to torment.
These people are capital “E” Evil. They are not to be “worked with” or appeased. Nothing less than total victory is remotely adequate, and that means that they have absolutely *no* voice in anything.
Polarizing? I am astounded that someone who purports to be a conservative would be reluctant to offend the vile scoundrels that have laid seige to the freedom of the human race.
I must say something...well...I will keep it to myself. Not that it isn’t fit to print...but I doubt you would ‘get it’ anyway.
Obviously you don’t understand, and are just like the Anarchists on the other side, buzzhead. Of course we want them acting as you said, but our candidate must not have acted like an idiot, and done things that can be PERCEIVED as unfit for service!
We need stable, and clean candidates, whose mental health or children’s actions we won’t be questioning later! For example the best candidates are people like Pence, Boehner, Cantor or DeMint....or someone focused on the issues WITHOUT THE BAGGAGE.
People who have questionable pasts or behaviors like MA Obamacare by Mitt Romney, or Gingrich, who had affairs, and had to resign as Speaker...that’s okay for Clinton, but not for a conservative candidate for President, although Gingrich has done a great service in his writing, and as a spokesperson on Fox.
I promoted Bush in 2000 and 2004, and I think he was a very good President, until last two years, but he was tired or set up by marxists against capitalism, terrorists, natural disasters , fires in CA, then 2008 Lehman, Paulson, and FDIC act to let Obama Win...and he did not see it coming. I haven’t read the book yet, so I won’t comment on that any further.
I agree that Palin is a great Conservative, but we need to be drawing attention to Obama’s mistakes and lies as President (but I’d rather see him impeached) during 2012 election. It is hard to unseat a current President in second election. Conservatives need to be making a list of his mistakes for ads.
I voted for Palin... not McCain, however her family will suffer greatly, if she runs in 2012, and don’t you care about that? Every single thing they have done since last election has been documented and scrutinized by every leftist journalist out there, just in case she runs.
Palin has a huge voice in the next election, and is untouchable as a private citizen, but if she runs it will be political suicide for her, for the left the gloves come off. It will be all about her and her family, not the issues, policies or things that need to be done. It will give Obama the advantage.
.
Just because you don’t like what I said doesn’t make it any less valid.
“buzzhead.”
Bite me.
“our candidate must not have acted like an idiot”
Palin has not acted like an idiot.
“done things that can be PERCEIVED as unfit for service”
Concern with perceptions is being used by the demonrats to intimidate the pubbies into eating their own young. Perceptions are not reality, they are the deception of the feeble-minded.
“We need stable, and clean candidates, whose mental health or children’s actions we won’t be questioning later!”
1. What kind of leftist troll would suggest that anyone would question Governor Palin’s mental health? Get back to DU, commie. As far as children go, the demonrats will invent stuff if they can’t find anything.
2. Show me just one elected demonrat who isn’t a serial felon. Show me just one who doesn’t have enough baggage to sink a battleship. Great googly moogly, Barney Fag was running a sodomite whorehouse out of his basement, and that scoundrel has never even come close to losing. The pubbies will always be losers until they man up and learn to tell the demonrats to kiss their butts.
“For example the best candidates are people like Pence, Boehner, Cantor or DeMint....or someone focused on the issues WITHOUT THE BAGGAGE.”
Every one of those politicians has skeletons in his closet. Bet on it. Further, no candidate who is acceptable to the RINO elite is morally fit to hold office.
“People who have questionable pasts or behaviors”
So, you’re saying that Governor Palin has had affairs, and has advocated socialized medicine? Or are you just hoping that if you fling enough baboon sh*t something will stick?
“I promoted Bush…but he was set up…and he did not see it coming.”
That was apparent two weeks into his first term.
“I agree that Palin is a great Conservative, but we need to be drawing attention to Obama’s mistakes and lies as President (but I’d rather see him impeached) during 2012 election.”
That is a total non sequitur. There is no conflict between the premises that Governor Palin is a great conservative and that we should be speaking the truth about the Bamtard.
“It is hard to unseat a current President in second election. Conservatives need to be making a list of his mistakes for ads.”
Ads aren’t enough. Conservatives need to be pamphleteering, publishing underground newspapers, knocking on doors, confronting demonrats in the street and busting up their rallies and demonstrations, distributing DVDs with watchable conservative content…and whatever else the left did to get where they are today.
“however her family will suffer greatly, if she runs in 2012, and don’t you care about that?”
Once again, bite me. What a cheap, low-life ruse.
Oh, wait, I see your point: Because the leftards are despicable scoundrels who abuse the children of Stupid Party candidates, no Republican should ever run for anything.
Troll.
“Every single thing they have done since last election has been documented and scrutinized by every leftist journalist out there, just in case she runs.”
Right, and the solution is to curl up in the corner and tremble in fear.
Road apples. The demonrats must be made to pay for their contemptible behavior. They must be punished. The solution is not pre-emptive surrender. The solution is to drive them from the field by any means necessary (other than the intrinsically evil).
“if she runs it will be political suicide for her”
Let’s see now, who was it that was in terror of a Palin candidacy and would do anything to stop it? Oh, yeah, the left.
“It will give Obama the advantage.”
Road apples. The other demonrats won’t allow him to run again. I just hope he has enough sense to step down peacefully, so they don’t have to kill him.
“Just because you don’t like what I said doesn’t make it any less valid.”
No, it is invalidated by the fact that it is either (1) leftard propaganda, or (2) deeply stupid.
LOL you sure do think you know everything. Go rant somewhere else.
Lord, don’t let dsc read that, I’ve already been blasted for voicing my opinion.
“our candidate must not have acted like an idiot”
“Palin has not acted like an idiot.”
MAYBE you should go back to school, and learn the difference between a general statement, and a specific one. That also goes for the ‘mental health’ statement, because neither one was addressing Palin, it was a general statement about a future candidate.
For someone who claims to know so much, it appears reading comprehension is a problem for you.
This is not the first time I’ve received a crass, inappropriate response from Gargantua.
He is not abiding by the rules of the forum and I would appreciate your addressing this issue, for the sake of other Freepers. Thanks, MM.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.