Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lee'sGhost; TexasGreg
It’s not about having the most “R”s; it’s about having the most conservatives/patriots.

First, you need to get control of the committees and chairmanships - that's where the power in the Senate and House resides. Those positions get to decide WHICH bills even come up for vote, before any RINO or Democrat can vote for it.

You need the most Rs first, before your conservatives can do squat. Castle would have at least caucused with the GOP meaning DeMint and other deep conservatives would be heading those committees, rather than Democrats.

Having 49 strong conservatives in the Senate means nothing, if they cannot set the agenda.

197 posted on 11/02/2010 6:02:03 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]


To: PugetSoundSoldier

KMA RINO lover.


215 posted on 11/02/2010 6:09:39 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Just vote them OUT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]

To: PugetSoundSoldier

Unless Castle would have bolted...which was a distinct possibility.


224 posted on 11/02/2010 6:12:13 PM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Johnny Rico picked the wrong girl!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]

To: PugetSoundSoldier

Thanks ... that’s been my point. You put it very well.


291 posted on 11/02/2010 7:17:00 PM PDT by TexasGreg ("Democrats Piss Me Off")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]

To: PugetSoundSoldier
Having 49 strong conservatives in the Senate means nothing, if they cannot set the agenda.

And it also means nothing if we have RINOs running the majority.

It should be a lot easier to elect a conservative in a conservative district to replace a RINO, than to expect the conservatives to only fight in swing and liberal districts. That game lets the RINOs have seniority and run things, even if they are a minority of the Rs.

Watch Braveheart again, and consider the ethics of the Scottish 'nobility'.

308 posted on 11/03/2010 6:50:49 AM PDT by slowhandluke (It's hard to be cynical enough in this age.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson