Bzzzzzzzzzztttttttttt. Wrong.
Being born in a state and being of age don't make one a "natural born citizen", no matter what State-Run-Media you listen to.
His parents were NOT U.S. Citizens at the time of his birth, and his "Certificate of Live Birth" was simply produced by Hawaii at the request of the parent....it doesn't mean he was BORN there at all...just that his Mother requested the document (supposedly, as with today's technology, any docement can be produced to pass as original). I won't even get into the lack of ANY documentation of his schooling, vacinations, etc. which are somehow SEALED to hide his whereabouts, attendance, funding sources for schooling, etc.
You have NO facts to bring to the table, obviously.
Go back to DU.
That about sums up your entire post. The only thing you offered that wasn't total speculation was the citizenship of Obama's father. (His mother was a citizen at his birth.)
“Being born in a state and being of age don’t make one a “natural born citizen”, no matter what State-Run-Media you listen to.”
It isn’t the media that says so, but the Supreme Court.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0169_0649_ZO.html
“His parents were NOT U.S. Citizens at the time of his birth...”
His mother undoubtedly was, although it doesn’t matter (see link above).
And a Hawaii birth certificate for someone born in Kenya would show Kenya as the birth place.
His public announcement of birth appeared in two publications. How they got there, I respectfully submit, YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE AT ALL. Speculations are unfortunately becoming "facts" and people like you are part of the problem in this important issue.
""Being born in Hawaii and over 35 years old makes him qualified."
"Bzzzzzzzzzztttttttttt. Wrong."
Bzzzzzttttt. Back at ya.
"Being born in a state and being of age don't make one a "natural born citizen", no matter what State-Run-Media you listen to."
Afraid it does, no matter what World Nut Daily tells you.
"His parents were NOT U.S. Citizens at the time of his birth..."
Which fact has nothing to do with his status if he was born in the US. The notion that it does is a birther fantasy with no basis in law.
"and his "Certificate of Live Birth" was simply produced by Hawaii at the request of the parent....it doesn't mean he was BORN there at all..."
Wrong again. It is an official Hawaiian birth certifcate that documents his birth in "Honolulu".
"You have NO facts to bring to the table, obviously."
You've been buying into discredited birther fantasies. They aren't facts, they are delusions.