Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MissTickly

Golly, why bother looking at the proof which destroys your current theory! Sheesh, that might make you have to reassess your assumptions and conclusions.

Wholey COW! You might have to apologize again! Heaven forbid!!

You disappoint me MT. You really do.


2,166 posted on 10/25/2010 9:29:25 AM PDT by Danae (Analnathrach, orth' bhais's bethad, do che'l de'nmha.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2164 | View Replies ]


To: Danae

And BTW, there’s no ‘proof’ of anything in an online photograph. This much is clear.

Only more questions. It’s been 20 hours since I first commented on this. You see what I mean.

It really isn’t you Danae—it’s Polarik. Don’t take any of it so personally—especially if I am wrong. You are just forever tied to him on this issue.


2,178 posted on 10/25/2010 9:51:01 AM PDT by MissTickly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2166 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson