One was screen-named “Arrogant SOB.” He/she/it was not alone. There were others who would also vote for any POS, however bad (like Nancyboy Kirk) so long as such a candidate would be a building block toward a “Republican” Senate Majority (while helping to make the GOP Caucus Obozo Lite) and a safe vote to preserve and protect Muffy’s trust fund.
There are many others, although I don't know how many are actually "from" Illinois.
Of course, now that Kirk has betrayed us on amnesty (yet ANOTHER issue where Kirk claimed to be "with us" and THEN voted the opposite way once elected... big surprise), I fully expect Kirk's fan club will flip-flop themselves and retroactive claim it's a "minor issue" and "Kirk never said he was against all forms of amnesty".
They did the same thing way back at the start of his Senate term, where they screamed constantly in November that stopping the lame duck session was "THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE EVER!!!" and that we MUST "SEAT KIRK IMMEDIATELY!", then changed their position 180o degrees in December when their hero Mark Kirk was seated and immediately began providing "bipartisan" support for Obama's lame duck session agenda ("who cares about a food bill?")
Like I said, this guy could sponsor and pass legislation to make Obama president for life, and they'd STILL defend him as long as he has that "R" next to his name.
Meanwhile, on the handful of issues where Kirk was supposed "better" than Alexi Giannoulias, he's broken every last one of them. This guy makes Arlen Specter look conservative.