Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ltc8k6

ltc — you are on the right point here. The law here seems to specifically grant the WI police permission to ask for/ demand ID.

Might be bad law, but it sure seems to be the law, supported in case law/ court decision.


120 posted on 09/23/2010 7:27:45 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]


To: Blueflag

This is from a poster at madison.com:

Ben Masel said on: September 22, 2010, 6:47 am
@bones1954:

while police may REQUEST ID at any time, they may DEMAND that one identify oneself only when they have “reasonable articulable suspicion” of a particular crime. See Hiibel v Nevada, Brown v Texas, and Kolender v Lawson, Supreme Court cases.

Even then, it’s not required to carry a physical ID except when driving, boarding a plane, etc


140 posted on 09/23/2010 7:39:58 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

To: Blueflag

This is from a poster at madison.com:

Ben Masel said on: September 22, 2010, 6:47 am
@bones1954:

while police may REQUEST ID at any time, they may DEMAND that one identify oneself only when they have “reasonable articulable suspicion” of a particular crime. See Hiibel v Nevada, Brown v Texas, and Kolender v Lawson, Supreme Court cases.

Even then, it’s not required to carry a physical ID except when driving, boarding a plane, etc


141 posted on 09/23/2010 7:42:01 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson