Coulter's opinion is correct - that women, especially single women, have bought into the idea that the purpose of government is to take care of people. They might as well have put a sign out: "Marxists Welcomed Here."
But long before modern single women embraced this idea, a large - really large - number of MALE politicians had to buy into it as well. It was MEN who controlled our government and who created and implemented what became known as The Great Society (FDR first, then LBJ and a host of others).
It's apparent that you (and your spouse?) have a deeply-held biblical foundation for your political beliefs. Understanding this gives perspective on your posts and comments.
Ironically, Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachman and Jan Brewer renounce the idea of government-as-caretaker. They espouse beliefs you claim to have. But if they were Steve Palin, Michael Bachman and John Brewer, you'd be all over it.
So it's not the politics that's important to you - it's the package. You tried to say that Maggie Thatcher is acceptable as a woman leader, knowing there is no one like her in our time (or for that matter, no one like RR).
Then why did Palin vow to be a champion for “special needs” kids as VP if she didn’t believe in the nanny state?