Obama sworn in for the second time
Posted on 07/25/2010 5:29:54 PM PDT by RobinMasters
Judges on the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals suddenly have abandoned plans to assess damages against an attorney whose clients are challenging Barack Obama's eligibility to be president after he argued that if there was to be punishment, he would have the right to know whether the defendants could have mitigated their injury by publicly releasing Obama's birth documentation.
The decision came from Judge Dolores Sloviter in the Kerchner vs. Obama case handled by attorney Mario Apuzzo. The court had ordered Apuzzo to explain why defense costs shouldn't be assessed against him for the "frivolous" appeal.
However, her newest order denied Apuzzo's request to reconsider the case and stated "based on Mr. Apuzzo's explanation of his efforts to research the applicable law on standing, we hereby discharge the Order to Show Cause."
The case was filed against Obama, Congress and others just before Obama was sworn into office, arguing that Obama was a British subject and not a U.S. citizen.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Ping
The court has decided to vote “Present”, just like the role model, Zer0.
“The case was filed against Obama, Congress and others just before Obama was sworn into office, arguing that Obama was a British subject and not a U.S. citizen.”
Kinda contradicts their assertion that NO ONE argued with Obama’s citizenship status BEFORE he was sworn in.
Please..don’t you know that a Xerox copy of a newspaper birth announcement is all you need for proof of natural born citizenship??
He was sworn in? I seem to recall some irregularities around the inaugural events?
The citizens of this country no longer have “standing” in a court system and government controlled by the self appointed elites.
These judges are as arrogant as Obama and the members of Congress who attempt to silence the questions of citizens attending town hall meetings.
You have a recording of this? Were the specified words spoken?
Just as a marriage to an ineligible-to-be-married person, such as a person already married, or one’s sister, or a member of the same gender, is invalid no matter how many upstanding witnesses swore to it, and a proper official performed the ceremony, and all certificates were issued — so to is Barack Obama NOT President, nor ever was President, no matter how many oaths were sworn in front of a million witnesses, Congress and the Supreme Court.
Because he was and remains ineligible to hold the office.
i never looked at it that way— i guess we assumed he was after seeing a photo of it — lol
I guess the lack of any Bible in the pic speaks louder than the words themselves........
“Obama Sworn in Again, With Right Words”
By Michael D. Shear
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, January 22, 2009
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/21/AR2009012103685.html
Dear bvw:
You said it all!
Now, if there just were some way to make it stick!
wow, so the second swear in wasnt leagal
This is an short (one hopes) era of humanity afflicted by a cancer of ‘empty but lengthy due process’ is given more weight in a justice system than real judgment and respect for Justice. Where simulation and virtual realities supplant actuality, and suppress and impair the relationship with the Divine.
Even great men like Justice Roberts, Justice Alito — who in other eras would not give a second’s whimsy to a wholesale fraud like Obama, are caught up in the tide.
Two authorizations by Pelosi, one according to the US Constitution & one ‘by law.’ Two swearings in. One on the Bible. One with who knows what words or actions?
Another act of war against America by the judiciary.
Where’s the HOLY BIBLE?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.