Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obesity Rating Must Be Included in Stimulus-Mandated Electronic Health Records, Says HHS
CNS News ^ | 7/15/2010 | Matt Cover

Posted on 07/16/2010 5:11:32 AM PDT by IbJensen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: IbJensen

BMI is NOT an accurate measurement of obesity and should never be taken as such. The BMI was a creation of the insurance industry, which uses it as part of actuarial tables to determine mortality risk when issuing life insurance policies. Only recently has the medical community begun to use it in the evaluation of obesity and related risk factors. Doctors use it because it is easy to measure.

In truth, the key measurement needed to measure obesity is body fat percentage – the percentage of fat compared to lean muscle, bones, organ tissue, water and fecal matter.

Here’s more: The BMI is known to be only accurate as related to body fat percentage for 68% of people. So the “revelation” that 1/3 of people measured as obese by their BMI are in fact not obese is no surprise to anyone with a wellness background.

Let me give you a typical example. On the BMI, almost all professional football linemen are obese, because the amount of muscle they have makes their weight in relation to their height “off the charts.” In fact however, most linemen have a body fat percentage of about 15-16%, which puts them right in the middle of the recommended range of 11-19% for men.

By comparison, running backs and defensive backs who are built for speed instead of muscle might be 5-10% fat.

So if you have heard that obese people might be healthy despite their weight, please disregard this info. You should measure body fat percentage.


41 posted on 07/16/2010 6:23:49 AM PDT by truthandlife ("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
The BMI is a flawed mathematical calculation, and the federal bureaucracy is going to insist upon using it for one simple reason: it allows them to punish people.

Please note that there are no cubic factors in this formula, which means it is not taking into account the volume of the person.

Mathematically, a 6' tall person should weigh 8 times what a 3' tall person weighs, since they are twice as tall and have a volume 23 = 8 times that of the smaller person.

In practice, the BMI classifies very tall, skinny people as obese, and very short fat people as normal or even underweight. Michelle My Bell probably thinks she's underweight because her fraudulent BMI says so, and that's why the lard-ass feels free to tell everybody else they're fat.

The fact that they are going to use this calculation proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that Obama and his minions are either completely stupid, or completely evil. There are no other choices.

42 posted on 07/16/2010 6:31:11 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law." -- Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
The obesity-rating regulation states that every American's electronic health record must: “Calculate body mass index. Automatically calculate and display body mass index (BMI) based on a patient’s height and weight.”

As if your doctor couldn't just look at you and say "You need to lose weight".

The BMI never made much sense to me. If you take the average height man with an "ideal" weight and then compared that to someone 10% taller, I would expect the taller man would weigh 33% more with the exact same proportions (10% taller, wider and thicker). However, the BMI calculations only allow him to be 21% heavier because it is based on the square of the height, thus he will have a 10% higher BMI than the "ideal" man even though he is exactly the same shape. And don't even get me started about muscle versus fat.

The law also requires that these electronic health records be available--with appropriate security measures--on a national exchange.

In other words, never tell your doctor anything you don't want on the front page of the New York Times if someone in the Obama Regime decides you are an enemy of the regime.

43 posted on 07/16/2010 6:34:51 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Gun control was originally to protect Klansmen from their victims. The basic reason hasn't changed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

I’ve posted a thread http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2553687/posts requesting a Socialized Medicine Forum topic so we can put all this stuff under 1 topic to make it easier to find and use. Please chime in.


44 posted on 07/16/2010 6:37:57 AM PDT by GailA (obamacare paid for by cuts & taxes on most vulnerable Veterans, retired Military, disabled & Seniors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife

My son was a football player in Middle School, he was 160 lbs and very muscular. His pediatrician said exactly what you said, and that it’s true of many athletic kids (football was one, but he mentioned men’s gymnastics and others)


45 posted on 07/16/2010 6:41:02 AM PDT by justsaynomore (The Hermanator - www.hermancain.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

Not only forget about the transplant but forget about any sort of treatment. Plus, the culture/society would be given a “free pass” to humiliate/tease/hurt anyone they deem too heavy. Pretty scary stuff.


46 posted on 07/16/2010 8:24:32 AM PDT by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

Not only forget about the transplant but forget about any sort of treatment. Plus, the culture/society would be given a “free pass” to humiliate/tease/hurt anyone they deem too heavy. Pretty scary stuff.


47 posted on 07/16/2010 8:24:46 AM PDT by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
Here’s more: The BMI is known to be only accurate as related to body fat percentage for 68% of people. So the “revelation” that 1/3 of people measured as obese by their BMI are in fact not obese is no surprise to anyone with a wellness background.

At 6'4" and 215 pounds my son is "overweight" with a 26.2 on the BMI scale. He is also a college basketball player with a tested body fat under 5%.

I'm also "overweight" on the BMI scale with a body fat under 10%.

Nice test...

48 posted on 07/16/2010 8:38:53 AM PDT by Senator_Blutarski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
The obesity-rating regulation states that every American's electronic health record must: “Calculate body mass index. Automatically calculate and display body mass index (BMI) based on a patient’s height and weight.”

A BMI based solely on height and weight is extremely flawed.

I use a Tanita bathroom scale which measures water vs. muscle.


49 posted on 07/16/2010 8:46:46 AM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Nice call, cheers!


50 posted on 07/17/2010 1:02:00 AM PDT by Ayn And Milton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson