Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Miltie

Kagan the pagan

among jewish people there is a type that jews themselves call a bagel and lox jew. Kagan the pagan is a bagel and lox jew. What does this mean? It means a person of jewish descent who mocks her own religion. A person who shuns her own religion. When she spoke at her nomination hearings this week and said she was probably like most jews at a chinese restaurant during christmas, what she is doing is insulting not only her own heritage, but christians as well. This is exactly what we do not need on the supreme court: an anti-religious pagan. She is the type of judge who stands in sharp relief to a serious person of jewish descent.

Louis brandeis became the first jewish supreme court justice in 1916. He was born of jewish parents who had immigrated from europe. He enrolled at harvard law school, graduating at the age of twenty with the highest grade average in the college’s history. As a lawyer he devoted most of his time to public causes and was later dubbed the “people’s lawyer” because he insisted on serving on cases without pay. As a member of the supreme court, he was a staunch defender of free speech and the right to privacy, but he opposed franklin roosevelt’s new deal power grab. As a jew, he worked for the creation of a jewish state long before world war 2. Would a man of this stature and dignity have joked about being at a chinese restaurant at christmas? Of course not. He would have realized that he would be mocking himself by doing so.

But as demeaning and self-loathing as kagan’s type of personality is, it can have grave consequences for the law and human lives as well. Take the case today of judge dennis g. Jacobs. Jacobs is chief judge of the second circuit cort of appeals, appointed by george w. Bush. He graduated from queens college where he later lectured in the english department. Then in 1973, he graduated from nyu law. Jacobs also once wrote this in an article: in our courts, judges are lawyers … most of us have never been, nor want to be, anything else. We are proud of being lawyers. For many of us (like myself), lawyering is our only talent (assuming we have any talent at all), and it is the source of as much esteem as we enjoy.

Does that sound funny to you? Because it’s not. It’s disgusting. Because today, this piece of garbage, jacobs, just threw out a death sentence against a double cop killer for reasons only lawyers can understand. The killer was found guilty of executing two cops in an undercover operation. He was given the death penalty in 2003. Yet this judge jacobs threw out the death sentence today because he claimed that prosecutors violated the cop killer’s constitutional rights by stating the cop killer wasn’t remorseful. It’s an insane technicality that only a lawyer could understand and only an nyu law graduate could accept.

This is what i mean when i say that pagan-like judges can have grave consequences indeed. Kagan is unqualified at any weight. She should not be confirmed, she should be filibustered. If we had a real two-party system she never would have been nominated.


7 posted on 07/02/2010 3:21:59 PM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: fishtank

“This is what i mean when i say that pagan-like judges can have grave consequences indeed. Kagan is unqualified at any weight. She should not be confirmed, she should be filibustered. If we had a real two-party system she never would have been nominated.”

She is damned sure unqualified to be a Justice. She couldn’t even answer the simple question that Sen. Coburn asked her about the limits of the federal government’s power. FYI, he asked her whether it was Constitutionally permissible for the feds to pass a law that would require each person to consume 3 servings of fruit and 3 servings of vegetables each day. Stupid beotch couldn’t say anything other than words to the effect of “well, that would be a stupid law...but merely being a stupid law doesn’t make it unconstitutional.”

Stupid statist DOLT: how about “Senator, such a law would be “void ab initio” [void from the moment of enactment] because the Constitution gives the federal government no power to legislate in the area of the consumption choices of the people of this nation.” How about THAT, you moron, you statist control-freak, you hater and destroyer of liberty?

I, a non- “bagel & lox” Jew (though I do like eating bagels and lox), completely despise everything that Kagan is and stands for, and I understand why Savage is pissed off. Of course, he’s almost always pissed off, but I understand that, as well: the libtards, the enemy within, have almost succeeded in destroying this country. Folks, Reagan was right:

“If we lose freedom here, there’s no place to escape to. This is the last stand on Earth.”

http://www.entertonement.com/clips/wqtxkcdnsg—This-is-the-last-stand-on-EarthRonald-Reagan-A-Time-for-Choosing-The-Speech-

Trust me, as a Jew who’s family has had to flee a number of nations over the years, Reagan was right - and so is Savage, who understands that we’re losing.

FUBO and FUEK. Obama delenda est!


16 posted on 07/02/2010 3:43:02 PM PDT by Ancesthntr (Tyrant: "Spartans, lay down your weapons." Free man: "Persian, come and get them!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson