[Artcore]

There are some on this thread who are labeling those of us who happen to disagree with Palin’s California endorsment, and other recent endorsements of RINOs as “Liberal Trolls.” Lets think about this, shall we:

Would a liberal be angry that Palin has been endorcing RINOs for the GOP? Nope! Lets remember, Liberals were gleeful when McCain (the King of the RINOs) was the GOP’s presidential candidate.

The left loves it when the GOP endorses RINOs...real conservatives don’t!

[wardaddy]

that is off the reservation twice now....sad

[wardaddy]

why do some freepers feel like they own a candidate and treat them like any criticism to that candidate is personal towards they themselves?

and I will go out on my usual limb and say that women here are the bigger offenders of this "possessiveness of the candidate"

they get like this cult of personality thing going and brook no dissent regardless

they did with Bush too...bigtime...that was gasoline for the harpie’s fire here back in the day even when Bush was unfortunately screwing up

now Sarah whom I support and have since I firs noticed her has backed both Queeg and Carly whom I don't care for

I guess I gather her logic or loyalty but I don't like it

she speaks of ideology and purity and then acts Machiavellian

oh well

but she is open to criticism same as anybody...it's fair game

[UCFRoadWarrior]

There was no reason for Palin not to endorse DeVore in the primary...and then later endorse the GOP winner in the election.

I think Palin should worry less about the party...and more about real conservative principles. She has made some good choices with her endorsements, but, in some of the real key races, she has gone RINO.

In most states Fiorina would be considered a liberal Democrat. She was totally ineffective as CEO of HP. Palin could not see that?

Also, anyone who worries more about the GOP winning a specific election....instead of conservative principles being valued...is a RINO.

[Outlaw Woman]

It's all about incrementalism which is what got us into this catastrophic situation to begin with. CA is going to be taken back only in increments; some of these states are too far gone with the mentality of liberalism and will never elect someone that is a staunch conservative (at this time). Their minds are so infected that one word against a conservative such as racist, homophobe, etc sends the voters into a panic. OTOH, someone that displays common sense and helps to ease the populous back into the ‘right’ thinking is electable. Look at Scott Brown's victory in MASS. Clearly he is not a staunch conservative however, he spoke good common sense during his campaign and that appealed to everyone. He was not a threat. There is now a ‘foothold’ in MASS...the door has been cracked back open.
I'm looking for the person that can get the job done. People that are outraged over this clearly don't see what this nation is up against. If we don't gain some ground in Nov (if elections are held) then it is truly all over.

[Deagle]

As I said earlier on another thread... Sarah has become way too political and seems to be disregarding her beliefs (if she has them)... Am very disappointed in her political decisions.