If Russell Pearce is so moral, why is he opposing a very moral law in his state ???
Is he representing the American citizens in his state who voted for him ???
Or the illegal aliens who broke into his country ???
Ask yourself...
Is there anything moral about a man who refuses to support a moral law ???
>>>>Is there anything moral about a man who refuses to support a moral law ???
America’s prosperity is based on the fact that Americans have a historic tradition of observing the rule of law. The reason why Mexico is poor, is because they have a historical tradition of disregarding the rule of law.
If America was to adopt the Mexican culture of disregarding the rule of law, America would become as poor as Mexico. If Mexico was to adopt a tradition of the rule of law, they would become as rich as America.
The rule of law is what makes America’s capitalist system to work. The enforcement of business contracts, an impartial judiciary, honest police officers - none of these would exist if there was no rule of law.
“Californian” was too quick to condemn. Russell Pearce is the one who is the big supporter of the Arizona Bill. Yes, he represents the American Citizens who voted for him. Over seventy percent of Arizonans want the immigration bill. Russell Pearce is very moral and is not opposing “a very moral law in his state”.
Please Californian Poster read the article you posted just a little bit more thoroughly.
“Californian” was too quick to condemn. Russell Pearce is the one who is the big supporter of the Arizona Bill. Yes, he represents the American Citizens who voted for him. Over seventy percent of Arizonans want the immigration bill. Russell Pearce is very moral and is not opposing “a very moral law in his state”.
Please Californian Poster read the article you posted just a little bit more thoroughly.
State??
It's a FEDERAL law that is being 'supported'!!