Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

S.C. governor vetoes bill on warrantless searches
scnow.com ^ | 4-2-10 | AP story

Posted on 04/03/2010 1:23:29 PM PDT by smokingfrog

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: DoughtyOne

A felon who served his or her sentence time wouldn’t be affected by the proposed law. OTOH it only takes a stroke of a pen to push things to that point. What do other states do in this vein and how much luck have they had in suppressing crime thereby?


41 posted on 04/03/2010 9:05:32 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Sanford just saved the state a lot of money with this veto. First person that would have been searched without a warrant would have won the lottery.

Remember, the cops ARE NOT your friends.


42 posted on 04/03/2010 9:06:03 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines

Of course I did. And I didn’t loooooooose any train of thought, even though I know how to spell “lose”.

Two of my pet peeves here: First, “unconstitutional” isn’t a synonym for “bad idea”. Second, “unreasonable search and seizure” means that a warrant is sufficient but not necessary.


43 posted on 04/03/2010 10:55:56 PM PDT by AmishDude (It doesn't matter whom you vote for, it matters who takes office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Vendome
Yeah, the cadence joke was pretty funny in its own right, but this guy is a liberal plant and just wants to make his point without any argument or debate; he's little lord faunleroy and wants to start the name calling and insults if you dare disagree with his left slanted opinions.

Now, excuse me while I go and practice my breathing.
44 posted on 04/04/2010 5:58:48 AM PDT by FrankR (Those of us who love AMERICA far outnumber those who love obama - your choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

A person on parole is a prisoner, given the privilege of serving part of his sentence outside of prison. Just like inmates, they should be subject to warrantless searches.

Sanford is an adulterer and a soft on crime RINO who cares more about thugs than their law abiding victims.


45 posted on 04/04/2010 6:09:48 AM PDT by Above My Pay Grade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

“Look folks do damnable things in their youth. Sometimes they commit felonies. That doesn’t mean that they should be second class citizens for life.”

First of all the warrantless searches would not be for life, but for the term of the parole.

If a thug received a 10 year sentence for attempted murder, and was paroled in 6, he would be subject to warrantless searches for the remaining 4 years he was supposed to be incarcerated.

Parole is essentially house arrest or ultr-minimum security prison. If the thugs don’t like the warrantless searches, let them serve their entire sentences behind bars.

Also, felons are, to some extent, second class citizens for life. They generally cannot own guns, vote, or be CEO’s of public corporations.


46 posted on 04/04/2010 6:18:13 AM PDT by Above My Pay Grade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan

“Sanford just saved the state a lot of money with this veto. First person that would have been searched without a warrant would have won the lottery.”

Totally incorrect. Warrantless searches for parolees are the law in many states and have been found to be constitutional. Parolees are prisoners given the gift of serving part of their sentence on the outside.

“Remember, the cops ARE NOT your friends.”

But the thugs they lock up and the liberal politicians who help the thugs rob, rape, and murder you and your family members are?


47 posted on 04/04/2010 6:25:42 AM PDT by Above My Pay Grade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: FrankR

LOL.

Happy Easter. He has risen.


48 posted on 04/04/2010 6:52:03 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Vendome; FrankR

Awww...group hug?


49 posted on 04/04/2010 9:14:35 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye; FrankR

Hug.

Now about the Bears. Will they make it to the Superbowl this year? /s (line from Planes, Trains and Automobiles)

LOL


50 posted on 04/04/2010 9:42:22 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
And I didn’t loooooooose any train of thought, even though I know how to spell “lose”.

Sounds like you have a loose caboose to me.

51 posted on 04/04/2010 11:56:57 AM PDT by Between the Lines (AreYouWhoYouSayYouAre?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson