[dirtboy]

Try here:

He becomes the poster child for the RINO clique's archetypal GOP candidate who: Has no differences in principle with the socialist minded Democrats;

Brown is against amnesty. So is Keyes. That is a MAJOR and CRITICAL variance from the Dems. Yet no mention from Keyes. And omission is the most powerful form of lie, to quote Orwell. That is the problem here - there are clear differences between Brown and Coakley, but Keyes refuses to acknowledge those, and broad-brushes Brown.

[pby]

Looking at the cited statement, I don't reasonably see the basis for calling Keyes a liar.

Having no difference with the socialist minded Democrats is a broad, broad statement.

In principle, like a socialist minded Democrat, Brown supports, among other things, government run health care and taxpayer funded abortions.

A politician, at his core beliefs,in his guiding principles, that can support and advocate for governemnt run health care is different...how?

[pby]

By the way, one could be a socialist minded Democrat and still oppose amnesty.

Opposition to amesty does not prevent one from being defined as a socialist as far as the definition goes.

[Carling]

Brown is such an avid opponent of amnesty that he is making robocalls in Arizona to support McAmnesty over CONSERVATIVE J.D. Hayworth.

What's funny about this Brown election is that I can already see it is going to cause a huge divide in the GOP. Perhaps the “Tea” Party is the answer after all, and McCain, Brown, and the other RINOs can continue to get steamrolled by the Dems.