Gee, if someone is writing with pretentious authority about professional journalists, then it seems rather obvious. One wouldn't insult a poster who railed about the federal judiciary by believing he might not know what the SCOTUS is, and one would assume that a FReeper pontificating broadly and harshly about professional journalists would be familiar with the Society of Professional Journalists, its membership, and its activities.
Dingy, a major rule of good writing is to ALWAYS spell out your acronyms. The above might get past your first response, but not your second. I'm not a reporter, and don't know what organizations they have, nor am I interested in the same. I'm talking about the facts on the ground, as evidenced daily by what I see in the media. If a "Society of Professional Journalists" exists, then it's either failing miserably, or has a very strange idea about what professional ethics are.
But this is about none of that, this is about your desire to play head games. Now kiss off, twit.