Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Calls Schwarzenegger's Furlough Order Illegal [Government by Judiciary!]
Sacramento Bee ^ | December 31st 2009

Posted on 12/31/2009 4:30:55 PM PST by Steelfish

Judge Calls Schwarzenegger's Furlough Order Illegal

BAndrew McIntosh

Dec. 31, 2009 An Alameda Superior Court judge has ordered the Schwarzenegger administration to cease and desist its practice of furloughing thousands of state workers who are members of the Service Employees International Union, Local 1000, offering the powerful union a huge victory as it enters 2010.

In a ruling handed down late Thursday, Justice Frank Roesch said the governor's reliance on provisions of the state's Emergency Services Act to order mandatory furloughs was flawed and illegal, saying "the emergency necessitating them was the failure of the Legislature to pass the budgets" yet the administration continued the furloughs even after the budgets were passed.

Roesch also said that the furlough plan has "interfered with the objectives of agencies" whose activities were funded with special funds, not general fund revenues, including the processing of Social Security disability reviews.

The governor's controversial executive order used his emergency powers to impose twice-monthly furloughs on more than 200,000 state workers in February when the general fund was sloshing in $40 billion of red ink. He added a third "Furlough Friday" in July to cover a portion of what was then a $24 billion budget hole.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: roesch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: Parley Baer

Mark my words .. the day is fast approaching where some freakin’ judge will decree .. “out of money??? I rule the state shall raise all taxes by 20%” ...

apologies if I gave any jurist this bright idea ..

- zig

Watch More Survivor


21 posted on 12/31/2009 5:13:11 PM PST by zigmeisterxiv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
For all I have family there (I escaped)...

Photobucket

22 posted on 12/31/2009 5:13:54 PM PST by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|Remember Neda Agha-Soltan|TV--it's NOT news you can trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
...Alameda Superior Court... Justice Frank Roesch...

What statewide office did this guy run for?

How can an Oakland Judge tell the Governor what to do? Judges have a great racket going... just wait for the Governor to make a decision, and then rule it unconstitutional and substitute your own preferred decision in its place.

Who needs to run for Governor anymore?

-PJ

23 posted on 12/31/2009 5:19:32 PM PST by Political Junkie Too ("Comprehensive" reform bills only end up as incomprehensible messes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
...cease and desist its practice of furloughing thousands of state workers who are members of the Service Employees International Union...

This is what it's really about.

It's about the SEIU exerting its power, since it has a friend in the White House.

-PJ

24 posted on 12/31/2009 5:22:53 PM PST by Political Junkie Too ("Comprehensive" reform bills only end up as incomprehensible messes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Well I guess California is just going to have to find another way to cut their payroll by 20%.

Looks like CA is going to have 20% unemployment when all the SEIU employees get their pink slips. Cry me a river.

They should all be thankful that they still have jobs.

25 posted on 12/31/2009 5:38:21 PM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

>> The reasonable alternative is to lay off everyone with an even state employee ID number.

A better alternative is to layoff everyone with a state employee ID number ending with the digits 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, and 0.


26 posted on 12/31/2009 5:45:29 PM PST by vikingd00d (chown -R us ./base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Why doesn’t Arnold issue an executive order that orders the Supreme Court Judge to pay the salaries of those that were to be furloughed?


27 posted on 12/31/2009 5:47:46 PM PST by Chewbacca (My gun has killed less people than Vice Pres Biden's motorcade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

A judge has ruled that the way Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has furloughed thousands of California correctional officers violates labor and wage laws.

Same judge..
http://www.sacbee.com/budget/story/2405447.html


28 posted on 12/31/2009 5:48:07 PM PST by oldteen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Just out of curiosity, suppose Arnold grew a pair and laid off thousands of workers. How is unemployment funded in CA? If it is a state controlled fund built by employers’ payments? If so, has it been raided and emptied like so many other states?


29 posted on 12/31/2009 5:51:38 PM PST by CriticalJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zigmeisterxiv
apologies if I gave any jurist this bright idea ..

Already happened in St. Louis. Some judge ordered property taxes to be raised to pay for busing students. Although there was a fuss, the county raised the taxes and the proles paid them.

30 posted on 12/31/2009 6:08:47 PM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: CriticalJ

Unemployment in California is paid by the employer. So it is funded by all employers in the state. We have about 15% unemployment here. When the unemployment check comes it is drawn off that fund. Thankfully, 85% are still working and their employers are still contributing.

The downside is that when the fund is low the rate of unemployment to the employer is raised. Even if you have no claims it doesn’t matter it goes up across the state. Essentially punishment for those hanging in there when the state has massive lay offs—which is now what will happen.


31 posted on 12/31/2009 6:27:39 PM PST by kmiller1k (remain calm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Then Justice Frank Roesch ought to pony up the money because I don’t want to give them any more.


32 posted on 12/31/2009 6:38:47 PM PST by rbbeachkid (The ONLY ones able to fix the economy - Small Business Owners!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Federal bailout....because California is too big to fail! lol


33 posted on 12/31/2009 6:43:34 PM PST by I am bigjohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
The only wake up call that will stick is a sovereign default of the US federal government.

Let them spend it all and go bankrupt returning us to 1850 std of living and laws.

34 posted on 12/31/2009 6:44:22 PM PST by Vet_6780 ("I see debt people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kmiller1k

Thanks for the reply. Seems like the increase for all employers, even those not receiving benefits, might be another incentive for businesses to leave.

Goin’ Galt.


35 posted on 12/31/2009 7:14:09 PM PST by CriticalJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

shorten the week one day.


36 posted on 12/31/2009 7:14:51 PM PST by the_daug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4Speed
Good, Fire them....well, Fire enough so California can afford who is left.

Sounds good on paper, but in practice, the highest paid, least productive "management" would be left, and any actual productive workers would be first to go. It's The Government Way

Even less would get done, at greater expense.

Think along the lines of a state hospital:

Nurses aides & housekeepers fired; floor nurses reduced 50%; nurse managers, Asst Directors of Nursing, etc retained and given overtime to fill the gaps; and a few dozen overflowing bedpans need emptying, the patients cleaned, and their beds changed....

37 posted on 12/31/2009 9:25:37 PM PST by ApplegateRanch (I think not, therefore I don't exist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson