Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Las Vegas Woman Victim of Foreclosure Mistake
LasVegas Now ^ | 12/22/09 | Gary Waddel

Posted on 12/22/2009 1:12:35 PM PST by Tom Hawks

LAS VEGAS -- A Las Vegas woman says she was the victim of a horrible mistake that left her with an empty condominium and a lot of questions.

Nilly Mauck lived in her condominium for two years and said she never had problem until a series of strange events eventually led to a company coming into her home and throwing away everything she owned.

As Mauck walks around her now empty condo, she can't help but remember how things used to look. Every room in the home is empty and Mauck says the reason is a mistake of address numbers. Her address is 1157, which is right next to 1156, a condo that is in foreclosure.

SLIDESHOW: Pictures from inside the condo before the trash out

A few weeks ago, the foreclosed home was supposed to get locks changed but Mauck says that's not what happened. "I came home to pick up something and there was a note on my door from the Brenkus Team of Keller and Williams Realty stating that they accidentally re-keyed the wrong door," she said.

It was a problem Mauck thought was fixed, until she came home to find a man going into her home. Mauck says everything inside was missing.

She says she later learned her home had been trashed out, a process done to foreclosures where everything left inside is thrown away.

Mauck says she contacted the Brenkus Team. "I said give me $100,000 to $200,000 to replace my things because it will take time and that is being generous. And they said, ‘Ok, that is too much.' She called me that day and told me they were only willing to give me $5,000," she said. "My clothes, my wedding dress, baby pictures, wedding photos, my dishes, my towels, my jewelry, anything you could possibly have in your house. I kept asking them, ‘Where did you take my things because I was ready to go and dumpster dive,' and they had no answer for me."

She is now staying with friends, because she doesn't want to go back to her condo.  "I do not feel secure because I know someone has access to my door," she said.

Attorney Michael Joe is a foreclosure specialist with the Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada. He says a mishap similar to this happened six years ago when Countrywide emptied a condo belonging to Gerald and Katrina Thitchener in a mistaken foreclosure. "A number of people were sued. Countrywide ended up paying over $1 million in damages in that case," he said.

Joe says proper legal steps and notifications must be followed when homes go into default.

Mauck admits she is behind on her payments, but that doesn't change the fact they got the wrong house. For now, she is getting an attorney as she learns to live with just the clothes on her back.

Realtor Teri Brenkus with the Brenkus Team could not elaborate on the whereabouts of Mauck's belongings, but says they are doing what they can to resolve the matter.

The company hired to remove everything from the condo is Rob and Renea's Home Preservation. They also had no idea where Mauck's belongings are.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banks; eviction; foreclosure; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: meadsjn
I'd say a fair settlement would be everything the Keller & Williams corporation owns, plus the personal assets of every single employee that had a finger in this fiasco.

I like your idea, but would add "and she gets to go through their homes with a blowtorch or a bulldozer (her choice)".

Pay up or hang.

They've apparently picked "hang" as their option.

41 posted on 12/22/2009 2:32:04 PM PST by mountainbunny (Mitt Romney: Would you buy a used car from this huckster?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: whd23
Here's the table:

OH I didn't realize there was a second page of photos

42 posted on 12/22/2009 2:38:06 PM PST by Domandred (Fdisk, format, and reinstall the entire .gov system. I am Jim Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Domandred

Still seems pretty sparse for someone that’s lived there for two years.


43 posted on 12/22/2009 2:39:05 PM PST by Domandred (Fdisk, format, and reinstall the entire .gov system. I am Jim Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Pilsner

> but if you reasonably thought you were authorized to do that act, you aren’t criminally responsible.

So in this case “color of right” is an absolute defense? If so, there must surely be a concomitant requirement to make good the “mistake”, otherwise what stops any/all burglars from claiming “color of right”?


44 posted on 12/22/2009 2:41:00 PM PST by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Tom Hawks
Realtor Teri Brenkus with the Brenkus Team could not elaborate on the whereabouts of Mauck's belongings, but says they are doing what they can to resolve the matter.

Ms, Teri Brenkus, I don't think you have the brains to blow your noise, but if you do, you better write that woman a check pretty damn fast, before she has you arrested for breaking and entering and ETC, ETC,. You have screwed up big time.

45 posted on 12/22/2009 3:08:59 PM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Assault

Yes, such as a 90 day storage building.


46 posted on 12/22/2009 3:10:37 PM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole

Oh I agree. $200,000 for the value of the property, $500k for the hassle, and another $1 million for punitive.


47 posted on 12/22/2009 3:33:05 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Domandred

Perhaps she was trying to pay her mortgage instead of out buying a bunch of crap.


48 posted on 12/22/2009 3:35:10 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

I have been packing in preparation for moving when I get a buyer.

Just the things I have already packed are marked-box by box- and I sat down & made a rack of 3 x 5 cards in alpha order so I could find things I had already packed, as my memory is getting thinner each day.

I have over 1000 cards, listing items, and I am convinced that the replacement value is well over $100,000. One box had a set of brake shoes for my dually, and a new set of them is over $80. that is just one box. Tools I have accumulated over 50 years are a whole thing again!!.
4 saddles alone are over $3000 EACH to replace. I don’t even know the value of many of the small items that have been handed down thru 4 generations of parents, etc.

This woman better have a great attorney, but I think she has the mortgage company by the short hairs—.


49 posted on 12/22/2009 3:56:45 PM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WaterBoard

She can still file a criminal complaint for all kinds of stuff...grand theft, conspiracy to commit theft...


50 posted on 12/22/2009 3:59:19 PM PST by Mamzelle (Who is Kenneth Gladney? (Don't forget to bring your cameras))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DieHard the Hunter
there must surely be a concomitant requirement to make good the “mistake”, otherwise what stops any/all burglars from claiming “color of right”?

Absolutely. You are responsible for your actions, and have to pay civil damages. Mistake of fact just saves you from criminal liability, and, assuming that you were not reckless, from punitive civil damages.

Criminals defendants do sometimes claim mistake, but it is a "do or die" defense, because you have to admit that you committed the actual act. Unless you are telling the absolute truth, it will very rarely help to use a mistake defense.

51 posted on 12/22/2009 4:19:22 PM PST by Pilsner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Tom Hawks

Rick and Teri Brenkus have LOTS of insurance (as mandated by Nevada law as a real estate brokerage). This woman can sue them and be just fine aside from getting her baby pictures back.

There are a lot of realtors in Las Vegas who are laughing their @sses off that the Brenkus’ are the ones who did this since they are about as hands-off as you can get and still be in the real estate business. They put their name on everything done in their company but they never touch anything themselves. Maybe a little personal attention would have avoided them this next huge judgement against them.


52 posted on 12/22/2009 6:09:12 PM PST by bpjam (If it seems to good to be true, best to shoot it. Just to be safe. - Fione Glenanne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson