Darwin is prominent because Darwinists continue to worship him, thus justifying a critical response. But you are simply ignorant when you imagine that criticism of modern schools of evolutionary thought are lacking.
Try actually reading some creationist literature some time and you will discover this. Oh wait, you already said you prefer ignorance on that point.
Anyway, the notion that there is a 'modern evolutionary synthesis' is a joke. Coming unglued at the seams is more like it. Ask any two (much less more) evolutionists to detail this so-called synthesis and you will soon see my point.
Yes. I choose to be ignorant of ignorance. Good bye.