I notice that you Creationists are whacking at strawmen most of the time. The solid science done between 1900 and 1940 that confirmed evolution you leave alone. Also, I don't see you touching successful theories such as the "Triangle of U" or other recent confirmations that have resulted from genome comparisons.
“But then, I don’t think the Bible should be used as a science book either. “
Some people have made some remarkable conclusions about our world using the Bible. It shouldn’t be written off quite so readily.
Read here about Nachmanides under the section *The creation of time*, among other things.
The Age of the Universe
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1576941/posts