[[Your comment showed an ignorance of the disparity of religious beliefs among the Founders, and an ignorance of political significance they placed on those beliefs.]]
Lol- I’m not theo ne displaying ignorance o n the issue here- you’re statement is blatantly false- and NOONE is sayign that every single foundign father and leader beleived exactly the same as al lthe others- of course there was soem diversity, however, as you wil find out IF you decide to actually display a bit of objectivity, and move beyond the typical erronious liberal talkign points, is that the WAS unanimity between a great many founders and leaders, and that God and lvoe for Him and r4espect for Him and askign for His blessings on htis nation, and turnign to him, was much much more prevelent than you typical ‘downplayers’ make it out to be
and what the heck are you doing goign fro mthe topic of the care Scribes who put God’s word into book form took to our founding fathers? Two seperate issues altogether- My statements and challenge to you stand- look into how seriously the scribes took their job, how dedicated and fearfully reverent they were when writing God’s word, and your ‘mistakes and errors’ argument falls flat on it’s face, and is nothign more than overblowing an irrelevent issue i nregards to how accurate and free from serious and significant error the bible has remained. As well, whenever there is any quesiton about some obscure and minor word, later Translators are careful to include possible menaings based o ncustoms, time periods as well as what they htought the word meant in accordance with hte context of the hwoel word- you’re ‘The bible is too full of error to be reliable’ argument is a false argument based on ignorance o nthe issue
You claimed that anyone who doesn't fall in line with your religious doctrines with regard to biblical inerrancy is a "liberal", and I slapped that idea down. Given the opportunity, I'll do it again.