“I did not state that natural selection claims to be able to explain the origin of life. I merely stated the fact that it cannot explain it. “
The theory of internal combustion can’t explain the origin of life, either. Nor can the Bohr model of the atom. Nor can the recipes contained in microwave cookbooks. Yet you were motivated to choose natural selection for the post that you now admit was meaningless.
I could have told you that. In fact, I think I did.
Natural selection cannot explain the origin of life. Fact or no? If fact, then what's your problem? Do you have a problem when people state facts? Are all facts meaningless to you, or just this one? Maybe its only relevant to you when you state a fact.
You claim that because I stated a fact, that I am "intellectually dishonest"; whatever that means. Also, in no way did I admit that what I said was meaningless (who knows where you ever came up with that thoughtless assertion). You're reading a whole lot of things into what I say that are simply not there.