Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: markomalley

Exactly.

And that’s EXACTLY what will be reported.

Because of one suck-up traitor.


40 posted on 11/07/2009 8:50:34 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (2012: Repeal it all... All of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Cringing Negativism Network

He did this to get re-elected, plain and simple. He had said he could not vote for the bill if it had abortion in it and it would be the end of his career, but he had to save his soul or something like that. So it was “taken” out and he voted yes to save his political career.

Shame on him.

I just knew he was the one republican that voted for it and how brave of him to wait until after they had 218.


81 posted on 11/07/2009 11:11:43 PM PST by nomifyle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network; Kakaze; markomalley

Look, I know there is a lot going on, but really, if any thinking citizen thinks that 177-1 is “bipartisan” they are too stupid to understand or become educated about more complex issues that plague us and our republic.

Thinking people who have initiative to look at 177-1 and understand that is NOT bipartisan are intelligent enough to know that socialism sucks.

Stupid sheeple who can not do that are just going to believe what Katie Couric or Chuck Gibson tell them anyway.


114 posted on 11/08/2009 4:15:24 AM PST by Canedawg (FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson