Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GVnana
I don’t think so. Whistleblowers must be a part of the organization they are exposing.

What if....
What if there was a dirty cop who was harassing you. You decide to secretly record his activities and make them public. You are not part of the police department but might be considered a "whistle-blower".

Now, what if ACORN was acting as an agent of the government, taking government money, working out of a government subsidized office space, giving out advice on how to work with (or around) the government - housing, tax advice, employment advice, etc.? You figure out they are dirty and secretly tape them. You are not part of ACORN,but are you acting to blow a whistle?

Is there a difference?

13 posted on 09/28/2009 6:07:27 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: SERKIT

Legally, yes. There is a difference. Whistleblower laws pertain to EMPLOYEES. See http://whistleblowerlaws.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=141&Itemid=54


17 posted on 09/28/2009 6:11:56 PM PDT by GVnana (Sarah for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson