I am representing my interest in knowing what I can about the important aspects of the person in the WH. I believe we are entitled to that, not by law, but because of the type of gevernment we have. The media failed in this responsibility last year. People bringing up the questions are treated as idiots and radicals for wanting to know the truth.
People tied to go to court last yar and several cases are still alive. People were told they don't have standing. Do we not have the right to an honest election and qualified candidates. Is that right and voting not enough to provide us standing? So ask the judges the question not me.
Last year the secretaries of state and the congress could have asked the natural birth question, but to date, we have been told none of them did. They just took his word. Have you every heard of people that crash special events and no one asks them who they are. Once in a while, they are caught during the event when someone asks the question. That is where we are with this fraud suspect. He just kept on pretending he belonged because no one stopped him at the door and asked for his papers.
It is my ubnderstanding from my reading here and various links that the COLB posted last year was not authentic.
The issue of his father's citizenship needs to be addressed by the USSC, since it is my ubndertsanding that not a lot has been settled on that issue in the past. Difficult for me to believe that the founders intended the son of a British citizen to serve as president under the definition of being "natural born." The fact that no one made a point of it last year merely indicates how hypocritical and weak the media and congress are; especially after calling for McCain's BC.
PS: I would run the spell check, but bad spelling is my trademark. However, I do like the fact, that when I type OBAMA, the spell check highlights it as an error.