Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CottShop
Sure htere is- Design in nture, at hte complexity levels witnessed in biology show the NEED for an intelligence- there’s oplenty of evidence showing both this NEED, and the FACT that nature is incapable of creatiung Irreducible complexity, especially on the grandscale seen in nature- plenty enough in ID to show the hypothesis of Macroevolution falls flat on it’s face, and that an intellgience is NEEDED behind hte designs witnessed- just as any forensic scientist discovers- The theory is that nature is incapable, and that an ID is NEEDED- one need NOT describe the atributes of the intellgience in order ot hsow the NEED for a designer- but you’ll apparently never udnerstand htis or admit this as we’ve discussed this many many many times here on FR and still you insist ID must somehow prove God exists with hard concrete evidence before ID can be accepted- (But hte proof is all around you- you just refuse to cede ANY of it, and apaprently htink that constantly degrading, insulting and maligning Creationists and ID’ists that htis somehow invalidates the NEED for a designer- it doesn’t- no more so than constantly degrading, maligning, and insulting the Myans refutes the FACT that htey existed based o nthe evidnece that shows they infact DID design great empires of compelxity that NEEDED a designer- silly rabbit

Ok, I lied. Did you really mean for this to be ONE sentence?! (Actually, you didn't even end it with a period, so maybe you're not done.) Wow. A very fast scan shows 21 spelling/typo errors. Since you misspelled "intelligence" twice the same exact way, I assume you simply can't spell it.

Please provide me one of these "oplenty evidences" for "irreducible complexity." You needn't get all technical with flagella and immune systems. Gimme something big; something broad. Let's focus on human anatomy. I have some specific questions regarding it, specifically our sexual anatomy. Perhaps you can start there, as we are the most perfectly designed creatures I'd assume.
357 posted on 09/10/2009 2:21:26 PM PDT by whattajoke (Let's keep Conservatism real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies ]


To: whattajoke

[[Wow. A very fast scan shows 21 spelling/typo errors.]]

wow- a very fast annalysis shows a silyl aobsession with spelling

[[Please provide me one of these “oplenty evidences” for “irreducible complexity.”]]

I told youwhere to look for plenty of evidnece- there’s several other excellent websites dedicated to examining the biological evidneces that show the NEED for an intelligent designer- spend your days doignsomethign that will save your soul instead of demandign everyoen do your homework for you-

[[Perhaps you can start there, as we are the most perfectly designed creatures I’d assume.]]

we are? Where is it written anywhere that a perfect God had to produce a perfection species? (hint- there ARE reasons for imperfection that have to do with exposing hte TRUE intent of a person’s soul and attitudes towards their creator- will they, or won’t they accept God DESPITE the fact that sin and pain exist? Will they ONLY accept God IF everythign is perfect? IF so- what kidn of fickle love is that? certainly isn’t TRUE love for our Creator- Amazing how pain fertilizes the REAL heart’s attitudes and devotions (Note- selfish peopel often leave when hte going gets tough)


380 posted on 09/10/2009 8:13:33 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 357 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson