Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Guy Blows His Thumb Off by Holding His Revolver Improperly - Graphic Images
Notoriously Conservative ^ | 08 11 09 | Notoriously Conservative

Posted on 08/11/2009 7:57:47 AM PDT by Notoriously Conservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last
To: Notoriously Conservative

If I recall this guy is sueing Smith and Wesson for millions of dollars due to his carelessness.

obama’s administration has caused a lot of gun purchases made by ignorant buyers. Get a mentor, some professional training and buy some books.

Leave the hand cannons alone until you did the research.


21 posted on 08/11/2009 8:19:25 AM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (NRA /Patron - TSRA- IDPA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6

People are stupid. Pistols are meant to kill people or shoot targets.

Rarely is anything more than a .357 or .45 justified.

Everything else is bragging rights and bravado.

Me, I rely on .38+P, .45, .40, or even .380 depending on location and need for concealment.


22 posted on 08/11/2009 8:19:25 AM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Notoriously Conservative
From the time that I first started shooting handguns as a young'n, I was taught:

1) Never rest any part of the hand at or near the front of the cylinder on revolvers.
2)Never rest the thumb behind the slide on a semi-auto.
23 posted on 08/11/2009 8:21:15 AM PDT by Ghengis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

I could never understand those massive handguns when a compact carbine of the same caliber would be so much faster & accurately aimed on the target.


24 posted on 08/11/2009 8:22:43 AM PDT by MCF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MCF
I could never understand those massive handguns when a compact carbine of the same caliber would be so much faster & accurately aimed on the target.

Perhaps you're too utilitarian.... I suspect that the real reasons for the purchase of a pistol like that involves a fair amount of penile compensation....

25 posted on 08/11/2009 8:28:04 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Notoriously Conservative

What a doofus. Why not hold the revolver with the left hand in front of the muzzle?


26 posted on 08/11/2009 8:33:11 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notoriously Conservative

Those look like little girl hands holding that side arm.


27 posted on 08/11/2009 8:36:01 AM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notoriously Conservative

My memory may be faulty, but this guy posted his experience on ARFCOM (www.ar15.com) about a year ago.


28 posted on 08/11/2009 8:36:07 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca
People are stupid. Pistols are meant to kill people or shoot targets.
Rarely is anything more than a .357 or .45 justified.
Everything else is bragging rights and bravado.
Me, I rely on .38+P, .45, .40, or even .380 depending on location and need for concealment.

I agree that many people get all starry eyed with some of the super caliber firearms these days.

I carry a 9mm. most days. I used to carry a .45 acp or .357 (with .38+p). But my 4" 9mm with a couple of high caps on hand is a comfortable enough carry. And I am prepared if, heaven forbid, I have to hunker down out in the sticks where it is common to have a 20-30 minute response from our Sheriff's Dept.

If I do decide to own a big toy that has a big boom, I'll buy it. Unlike this fellow, I'll make sure that I know how to use it safely.

29 posted on 08/11/2009 8:37:19 AM PDT by Ghengis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5
If I recall this guy is sueing Smith and Wesson for millions of dollars due to his carelessness.

I figured that given his "excessive" comment. I can light a firecracker in my open hand and get a little pain, or light a quarter-stick and probably lose my hand. The damage of neither is excessive given what they're designed for.

30 posted on 08/11/2009 8:37:26 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek; Responsibility2nd

I have a .22LR NAA Mini - not powerful enough to do that kind of damage, but if you put a finger ahead of the cylinder face you won’t do it a second time.

From personal painful experience, I have no question a .460 could do exactly that damage.


31 posted on 08/11/2009 8:38:10 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (Your opinion is doubleplusungoodthinkful. You have been reported to flag@whitehouse.gov.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca

Except in Alaska, where having a “hand cannon” on your hip, in the wilderness, is a good piece of insurance.

Your .357 or .45 wouldn’t do squat compared to a .44, .454 Casull and now the .500/.460 derivatives.

Otherwise, I’d agree.
But, some people like big explosions.
The smart ones are smart enough not to think about these things for carry or defense against two-legged vermin.


32 posted on 08/11/2009 8:38:55 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE

“But, some people like big explosions.
The smart ones are smart enough not to think about these things for carry or defense against two-legged vermin.”

Could you imagine how loud that thing would be in the middile of the night standing in the hallway of your bedroom trying todefend your family!?!? Not to mention the over penetration aspect that sucker would be LOUD!!!


33 posted on 08/11/2009 8:45:59 AM PDT by Syntyr (If its too loud your too old...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Notoriously Conservative
Un-fricking-believable! Revolvers have something called a "cylinder gap." This is the tiny space between the face of the cylinder and the forcing cone of the barrel. It's a tiny gap, but if you ever watch a revolver fire, you'll see quite a bit of blast, including metal shavings and unburned powder. I used to load up some "monster" loads in my .44Mag, where I pretty much filled the case with WW296 and put the bullet on, giving me a 180gr JHP load, moving at about 1800fps. The muzzle blast was ENORMOUS, as was the blast coming out of the cylinder gap.

I just can't believe the grip this guy used! This is on-par with the morons who get their off-hand thumb nearly cut off by semi-autos when the slide recoils.

Mark

34 posted on 08/11/2009 8:59:28 AM PDT by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notoriously Conservative

That green gang is pretty lethal. If they get you, you’re gonna die.


35 posted on 08/11/2009 9:06:10 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Why Does Obama Want Health Care in 4 Weeks When it Took Him 6 Months to Pick a Dog?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca
People are stupid. Pistols are meant to kill people or shoot targets.

Rarely is anything more than a .357 or .45 justified.

There's such a thing called "hunting." .357Mag is marginal for deer. .45LC can be up-loaded in a modern revolver, to near .44Mag loads, but you're better off using "the real thing." But for dangerous game, .44Mag is about the smallest load I'd want to use. Heavier loads are better, .444Marlin, .45/70, .375JDJ, .454 Casul, .460, .500, etc...

Everything else is bragging rights and bravado.

Me, I rely on .38+P, .45, .40, or even .380 depending on location and need for concealment.

Take a look at the revolver. Concealment is NOT an issue.

Mark

36 posted on 08/11/2009 9:12:45 AM PDT by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

I understand that some people hunt with pistols of various kinds. A rifle seems to be more logical and humane.

(For the record, I am not a hunter. It’s difficult for hunted meat to be deemed “kosher” and hunting for sport has been frowned upon for Jews (not others) since the time of Esau.)


37 posted on 08/11/2009 9:19:07 AM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Syntyr

I got a chance to fire one of the very first S&W 500 revolvers about four or five years ago.

I was scared shitless, but I’ve fired .44mags, .454 casulls and .50 AE, so I had some experience.

I bent my elbow and let thing WHIP! over my head.

Amazingly, I was 4” low at 6 o’clock at 25 meters.


38 posted on 08/11/2009 9:28:37 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca

Some states have hundgun hunting seasons, allowing you to get another crack at bagging a criter.


39 posted on 08/11/2009 9:29:39 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

As a caveat to my previous post, note I am not remotely anti-firearm.

I, however, utilize firearms for defense of home and family.


40 posted on 08/11/2009 9:29:42 AM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson