My point, for those who seem to be smoking hash in Rio Linda tonight, was simple: an official with the authority to do so made a positive declaration about something. I didn't say the official wasn't lying, because I can't know that. But I know a positive declaration is absolute and final, and its trustworthiness is presumed.
I think it's extremely unlikely the official is lying, but, as I said, I don't really know.
I also know that, ultimately, people will reason as follows: "look, a president is elected on the perception of his merits as an adult, not on the conditions or locale of his birth."
Perhaps those conditions disqualify him from having entered the election process to begin with, perhaps they don't. I guess that's where guys like you come in.
Legally she cannot reveal anything that's in a document without permission. She stated there was a Hawaiian BC last year. Anyone can get one. This statement only says "original vital records" whatever that means. And it's plural. More than one type of BC? A foreign one and a Hawaiian one? Anyway it's a clintonesque statement and nicely parsed.